Prokinetic effect of erythromycin after colorectal surgery: Randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study

Andrew J. Smith, Aviram Nissan, Nicole M. Lanouette, Weiji Shi, Jose G. Guillem, W. Douglas Wong, Howard Thaler, Alfred M. Cohen*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

85 Scopus citations

Abstract

PURPOSE: Nausea and vomiting three to seven days after an elective operation on the colon and rectum remain a persistent clinical problem. Erythromycin, a safe, inexpensive drug that stimulates intestinal motilin receptors, has previously been shown to accelerate gastric emptying significantly after upper gastrointestinal surgery. We aimed to evaluate the effect of postoperative intravenous erythromycin on postoperative ileus in patients undergoing elective surgery for primary colorectal cancer. METHODS: Between May 1998 and April 1999, 150 patients undergoing primary resection of colon or rectal cancer were enrolled in this prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. One hundred thirty-four patients completed the study. Patients were excluded if they had extensive metastatic disease, were taking medications known to interact with erythromycin, or if they required an ileostomy. Patients received either 200 mg of intravenous erythromycin or placebo every six hours. Clinical endpoints were recorded and continuous endpoints are presented as mean ± standard deviation. RESULTS: There were no significant complications related to erythromycin. The erythromycin (n = 65) and placebo (n = 69) groups were comparable regarding demographic and operative factors. The erythromycin group had a slightly shorter length of time to passage of flatus (4.1 ± 1.3 vs. 4.4 ± 1.1 days; P = 0.03). There was no significant difference between erythromycin and placebo in time to first solid food (5.6 ± 1.9 vs. 5.4 ± 1.8 days), time to first bowel movement (5.2 ± 1.9 vs. 5.4 ± 1.3 days), or time to discharge from hospital (7.5 ± 2.0 vs. 7.6 ± 2.8 days). There was no difference in the rate of clinically significant nausea (26 vs. 26 percent; P = 0.99), vomiting (17 vs. 16 percent; P = 0.88), or nasogastric tube placement (9 vs. 7 percent; P = 0.68). CONCLUSIONS: Erythromycin does not seem to alter clinically important outcomes related to postoperative ileus in patients undergoing resection for colorectal cancer.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)333-337
Number of pages5
JournalDiseases of the Colon and Rectum
Volume43
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2000
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Colorectal surgery
  • Erythromycin
  • Nasogastric tube
  • Postoperative ileus
  • Randomized trial

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Prokinetic effect of erythromycin after colorectal surgery: Randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this