Procedural results and late clinical outcomes after percutaneous interventions using long (≥mm) versus short (<20 mm) stents

Ran Kornowski, Balram Bhargava, D. M.Shmuel Fuchs, Alexandra J. Lansky, Lowell F. Satler, Augusto D. Pichard, Mun K. Hong, Kenneth M. Kent, Roxana Mehran, Gregg W. Stone, Martin B. Leon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

44 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate clinical outcomes after the use of long coronary stents. Background: The use of long slotted-tube stents has been recently approved in the U.S. to treat long lesions or dissections. Procedural success and long-term outcomes of long versus short stents have not been established. Methods: We evaluated procedural success, major in-hospital complications, target lesion, revascularization and long-term (one year) clinical outcomes in 1,226 consecutive patients (1,259 native coronary lesions) who underwent a single vessel intervention using a single long (≥25 mm, 116 patients) or short (<20 mm, 1,110 patients) tubular-slotted stent. Results: Patients treated with long stents had more diffuse (>10 mm length) lesions (63% vs. 28%, p = 0.001). The mean stent length was 28 ± 5 mm versus 15 ± 2 mm for long versus short stent groups (p = 0.0001). Overall procedural success was similar in the long versus short stent groups (96% vs. 98%, p = 0.08). However. Major in-hospital complications tended to occur more frequently in patients treated with longer stents (3.4% vs. 1.0%, p = 0.04). The rate of periprocedural non-Q-wave myocardial infarction (MI) (creatine kinase-MB ≥5 times normal) was notably higher after long stent implantation (23% vs. 11%, p = 0.001). Target lesion revascularization at one year was 14.5% vs. 13.8% (p = 0.69), and target vessel revascularization rate was 19.6% vs. 17.3% (p = 0.41) in the long versus short stent group, respectively. There was no difference in one year mortality (2.5% vs. 3.5%, p = 0.49) or Q-wave MI (2.7% vs. 1.2%, p = 0.48), and the overall cardiac event-free survival was similar for the two groups (81%). Conclusions: The use of single coronary long (≥25 mm) versus short (<20 mm) stents is associated with: 1) somewhat increased major procedural complications, 2) significantly higher frequency of periprocedural non-Q-wave Mis, and 3) equivalent repeat revascularization risk and cardiac event-free survival out-of-hospital up to one year. (C) 2000 by the American College of Cardiology.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)612-618
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of the American College of Cardiology
Volume35
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Mar 2000
Externally publishedYes

Funding

FundersFunder number
Cardiology Research Foundation
Washington Cardiology Center

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Procedural results and late clinical outcomes after percutaneous interventions using long (≥mm) versus short (<20 mm) stents'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this