Probabilistic justice against status defense: inequality, uncertainty, and the future of the welfare state

Rachel Z. Friedman*, Torben Iversen

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The postwar welfare state provides social insurance against economic, health, and related risks in an uncertain world. Because everyone can envision themselves to be among the unfortunate, social insurance fuses self-interest and solidarism in a normative principle Friedman (2020) calls probabilistic justice. But there is a competing principle of status defense, where the aim is to erect boundaries between socioeconomic strata and discourage cross-class mobility. We argue that this principle dominates when inequality is high and uncertainty low. The current moment is one of high inequality and high uncertainty, which results in intense status anxiety, yet does not rule out solidaristic solutions. Our contributions are to diagnose the causes of our current malaise, and to theorize the normative bases for the political choice facing contemporary western democracies.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)829-853
Number of pages25
JournalTheory and Society
Volume53
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2024

Keywords

  • ICT revolution
  • Populism
  • Social insurance
  • Status anxiety
  • Welfare state

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Probabilistic justice against status defense: inequality, uncertainty, and the future of the welfare state'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this