TY - JOUR
T1 - Private Law Exceptionalism? Part II
T2 - A Basic Difficulty with the Argument from Formal Equality
AU - Dorfman, Avihay
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 2018.
PY - 2018
Y1 - 2018
N2 - Contemporary discussions of private law theory often assume that parties in a private law interaction can relate as equals if, and only if, equality is cast in terms of formal equality (sometimes called transactional equality). I devote these pages to refute this conceptual view, showing that it does not draw correctly the map of the logical space in which conceptions of private law equality are located. Negatively, I argue that the formal conception of equality, most comprehensively defended by certain influential corrective justice theories, does not exhaust this space. Affirmatively, I argue that this space provides room for at least one more conception which I call 'substantive equality'.
AB - Contemporary discussions of private law theory often assume that parties in a private law interaction can relate as equals if, and only if, equality is cast in terms of formal equality (sometimes called transactional equality). I devote these pages to refute this conceptual view, showing that it does not draw correctly the map of the logical space in which conceptions of private law equality are located. Negatively, I argue that the formal conception of equality, most comprehensively defended by certain influential corrective justice theories, does not exhaust this space. Affirmatively, I argue that this space provides room for at least one more conception which I call 'substantive equality'.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85054660960&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1017/cjlj.2018.1
DO - 10.1017/cjlj.2018.1
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:85054660960
SN - 0841-8209
VL - 31
SP - 5
EP - 32
JO - Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence
JF - Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence
IS - 1
ER -