TY - JOUR
T1 - Present participles
T2 - Categorial classification and derivation
AU - Meltzer-Asscher, Aya
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was supported by the ISRAEL SCIENCE FOUNDATION, grant No. 44/05. I am grateful to Julia Horvath, Tal Siloni, Irena Botwinik, and Julie Fadlon for their insightful remarks, and to the Lexicon-Syntax Project group in the Linguistics Department of Tel Aviv University for helpful discussion. Additional thanks are due to three Lingua reviewers, for their very
PY - 2010/9
Y1 - 2010/9
N2 - The paper focuses on the categorial status of present participles in English and Hebrew, and on their formation. Using a large number of diagnostics, I show that while all present participles are verbal, only a subset of them are ambiguous, and have an adjectival reading in addition to their verbal one. I further claim that this subset is constrained aspectually: only stative verbs have adjectival present participle correlates. This constraint stems from the impoverished nature of the adjectival present participle morpheme, which is incapable of manipulating the aspectual properties of verbs. Having established a categorial split between two types of present participles, I argue that adjectival present participles are derived in the lexicon, and verbal ones-in the syntax, and outline the lexical operation deriving adjectival present participles from verbs. Finally, I discuss the prenominal position in English, showing that it must be analyzed as being able to host reduced relative clauses, and not only APs. The analysis offered in the paper sheds light on the nature of participles, reinforcing the view that ambiguous participles do not belong to a "mixed" or "neutralized" category, but rather correspond to two homophonous forms-one verbal and one adjectival.
AB - The paper focuses on the categorial status of present participles in English and Hebrew, and on their formation. Using a large number of diagnostics, I show that while all present participles are verbal, only a subset of them are ambiguous, and have an adjectival reading in addition to their verbal one. I further claim that this subset is constrained aspectually: only stative verbs have adjectival present participle correlates. This constraint stems from the impoverished nature of the adjectival present participle morpheme, which is incapable of manipulating the aspectual properties of verbs. Having established a categorial split between two types of present participles, I argue that adjectival present participles are derived in the lexicon, and verbal ones-in the syntax, and outline the lexical operation deriving adjectival present participles from verbs. Finally, I discuss the prenominal position in English, showing that it must be analyzed as being able to host reduced relative clauses, and not only APs. The analysis offered in the paper sheds light on the nature of participles, reinforcing the view that ambiguous participles do not belong to a "mixed" or "neutralized" category, but rather correspond to two homophonous forms-one verbal and one adjectival.
KW - Adjectives
KW - Lexical operations
KW - Present participles
KW - Reduced relatives
KW - Stative verbs
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77953121553&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.lingua.2010.03.002
DO - 10.1016/j.lingua.2010.03.002
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:77953121553
SN - 0024-3841
VL - 120
SP - 2211
EP - 2239
JO - Lingua
JF - Lingua
IS - 9
ER -