TY - JOUR
T1 - Predictors of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in the multicenter automatic defibrillator implantation trial with cardiac resynchronization therapy (MADIT-CRT)
AU - Goldenberg, Ilan
AU - Moss, Arthur J.
AU - Hall, W. Jackson
AU - Foster, Elyse
AU - Goldberger, Jeffrey J.
AU - Santucci, Peter
AU - Shinn, Timothy
AU - Solomon, Scott
AU - Steinberg, Jonathan S.
AU - Wilber, David
AU - Barsheshet, Alon
AU - McNitt, Scott
AU - Zareba, Wojciech
AU - Klein, Helmut
PY - 2011/10/4
Y1 - 2011/10/4
N2 - Background-: We hypothesized that combined assessment of factors that are associated with favorable reverse remodeling after cardiac resynchronization- defibrillator therapy (CRT-D) can be used to predict clinical response to the device. Methods and Results-: The study population comprised 1761 patients enrolled in the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial With Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (MADIT-CRT). Best-subset regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with echocardiographic response (defined as percent reduction in left ventricular end-diastolic volume 1 year after CRT-D implantation) and to create a response score. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was used to evaluate the CRT-D versus defibrillator-only reduction in the risk of heart failure or death by the response score. Seven factors were identified as associated with echocardiographic response to CRT-D and made up the response score (female sex, nonischemic origin, left bundle-branch block, QRS ≥150 milliseconds, prior hospitalization for heart failure, left ventricular end-diastolic volume ≥125 mL/m, and left atrial volume <40 mL/m). Multivariate analysis showed a 13% (P<0.001) increase in the clinical benefit of CRT-D per 1-point increment in the response score (range, 0-14) and a significant direct correlation between risk reduction associated with CRT-D and response score quartiles: Patients in the first quartile did not derive a significant reduction in the risk of heart failure or death with CRT-D (hazard ratio=0.87; P=0.52); patients in the second and third quartiles derived 33% (P=0.04) and 36% (P=0.03) risk reductions, respectively; and patients in the upper quartile experienced a 69% (P<0.001) risk reduction (P for trend=0.005). Conclusion-: Combined assessment of factors associated with reverse remodeling can be used for improved selection of patients for cardiac resynchronization therapy.
AB - Background-: We hypothesized that combined assessment of factors that are associated with favorable reverse remodeling after cardiac resynchronization- defibrillator therapy (CRT-D) can be used to predict clinical response to the device. Methods and Results-: The study population comprised 1761 patients enrolled in the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial With Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (MADIT-CRT). Best-subset regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with echocardiographic response (defined as percent reduction in left ventricular end-diastolic volume 1 year after CRT-D implantation) and to create a response score. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was used to evaluate the CRT-D versus defibrillator-only reduction in the risk of heart failure or death by the response score. Seven factors were identified as associated with echocardiographic response to CRT-D and made up the response score (female sex, nonischemic origin, left bundle-branch block, QRS ≥150 milliseconds, prior hospitalization for heart failure, left ventricular end-diastolic volume ≥125 mL/m, and left atrial volume <40 mL/m). Multivariate analysis showed a 13% (P<0.001) increase in the clinical benefit of CRT-D per 1-point increment in the response score (range, 0-14) and a significant direct correlation between risk reduction associated with CRT-D and response score quartiles: Patients in the first quartile did not derive a significant reduction in the risk of heart failure or death with CRT-D (hazard ratio=0.87; P=0.52); patients in the second and third quartiles derived 33% (P=0.04) and 36% (P=0.03) risk reductions, respectively; and patients in the upper quartile experienced a 69% (P<0.001) risk reduction (P for trend=0.005). Conclusion-: Combined assessment of factors associated with reverse remodeling can be used for improved selection of patients for cardiac resynchronization therapy.
KW - cardiac pacing, artificial
KW - heart failure
KW - prevention and control
KW - ventricular remodeling
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80053567485&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.014324
DO - 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.014324
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 21900084
AN - SCOPUS:80053567485
SN - 0009-7322
VL - 124
SP - 1527
EP - 1536
JO - Circulation
JF - Circulation
IS - 14
ER -