Predictors of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in the multicenter automatic defibrillator implantation trial with cardiac resynchronization therapy (MADIT-CRT)

Ilan Goldenberg*, Arthur J. Moss, W. Jackson Hall, Elyse Foster, Jeffrey J. Goldberger, Peter Santucci, Timothy Shinn, Scott Solomon, Jonathan S. Steinberg, David Wilber, Alon Barsheshet, Scott McNitt, Wojciech Zareba, Helmut Klein

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background-: We hypothesized that combined assessment of factors that are associated with favorable reverse remodeling after cardiac resynchronization- defibrillator therapy (CRT-D) can be used to predict clinical response to the device. Methods and Results-: The study population comprised 1761 patients enrolled in the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial With Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (MADIT-CRT). Best-subset regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with echocardiographic response (defined as percent reduction in left ventricular end-diastolic volume 1 year after CRT-D implantation) and to create a response score. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was used to evaluate the CRT-D versus defibrillator-only reduction in the risk of heart failure or death by the response score. Seven factors were identified as associated with echocardiographic response to CRT-D and made up the response score (female sex, nonischemic origin, left bundle-branch block, QRS ≥150 milliseconds, prior hospitalization for heart failure, left ventricular end-diastolic volume ≥125 mL/m, and left atrial volume <40 mL/m). Multivariate analysis showed a 13% (P<0.001) increase in the clinical benefit of CRT-D per 1-point increment in the response score (range, 0-14) and a significant direct correlation between risk reduction associated with CRT-D and response score quartiles: Patients in the first quartile did not derive a significant reduction in the risk of heart failure or death with CRT-D (hazard ratio=0.87; P=0.52); patients in the second and third quartiles derived 33% (P=0.04) and 36% (P=0.03) risk reductions, respectively; and patients in the upper quartile experienced a 69% (P<0.001) risk reduction (P for trend=0.005). Conclusion-: Combined assessment of factors associated with reverse remodeling can be used for improved selection of patients for cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1527-1536
Number of pages10
JournalCirculation
Volume124
Issue number14
DOIs
StatePublished - 4 Oct 2011
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • cardiac pacing, artificial
  • heart failure
  • prevention and control
  • ventricular remodeling

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Predictors of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in the multicenter automatic defibrillator implantation trial with cardiac resynchronization therapy (MADIT-CRT)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this