TY - JOUR
T1 - Prediction of successful trial of labor after cesarean - The benefit of prior vaginal delivery
AU - Ashwal, Eran
AU - Wertheimer, Avital
AU - Aviram, Amir
AU - Wiznitzer, Arnon
AU - Yogev, Yariv
AU - Hiersch, Liran
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Taylor & Francis.
PY - 2016/8/17
Y1 - 2016/8/17
N2 - Objective: To determine predictive factors for vaginal birth after cesarean section (VBAC).Methods: A retrospective cohort study of all women with singleton pregnancies and a prior single low transverse cesarean section (CS) who attempted vaginal delivery in a tertiary hospital (2010-2014). Pregnancy outcome of women with VBAC was compared to those who failed vaginal delivery. Sub-analysis for women with no prior vaginal deliveries was performed. Pregnancies with non-cephalic presentation, estimated fetal weight >4000 g and any contraindications for vaginal delivery were excluded.Results: Of the 40 714 deliveries, 1767 women met inclusion criteria. Among them 1563 (88.5%) had a VBAC and 204 (11.5%) failed. There was no significant difference between the groups regarding maternal age, comorbidities and pregnancy complications. Predictors for VBAC were (odds ratio, 95% confidence interval) interval from prior CS (1.13, 1.04-1.22, p=0.004), previous VBAC (2.77, 1.60-4.78, p < 0.001), prior vaginal delivery prior to the CS (3.05, 1.73-5.39, p < 0.001) and induction of labor (0.62, 0.40-0.97, p = 0.03). For women with no prior vaginal birth, only birthweight was associated with VBAC (0.99, 0.99-1.00, p = 0.02).Conclusion: While different variables may influence the rate of VBAC, the predictive ability of VBAC for women with no previous vaginal deliveries remains poor.
AB - Objective: To determine predictive factors for vaginal birth after cesarean section (VBAC).Methods: A retrospective cohort study of all women with singleton pregnancies and a prior single low transverse cesarean section (CS) who attempted vaginal delivery in a tertiary hospital (2010-2014). Pregnancy outcome of women with VBAC was compared to those who failed vaginal delivery. Sub-analysis for women with no prior vaginal deliveries was performed. Pregnancies with non-cephalic presentation, estimated fetal weight >4000 g and any contraindications for vaginal delivery were excluded.Results: Of the 40 714 deliveries, 1767 women met inclusion criteria. Among them 1563 (88.5%) had a VBAC and 204 (11.5%) failed. There was no significant difference between the groups regarding maternal age, comorbidities and pregnancy complications. Predictors for VBAC were (odds ratio, 95% confidence interval) interval from prior CS (1.13, 1.04-1.22, p=0.004), previous VBAC (2.77, 1.60-4.78, p < 0.001), prior vaginal delivery prior to the CS (3.05, 1.73-5.39, p < 0.001) and induction of labor (0.62, 0.40-0.97, p = 0.03). For women with no prior vaginal birth, only birthweight was associated with VBAC (0.99, 0.99-1.00, p = 0.02).Conclusion: While different variables may influence the rate of VBAC, the predictive ability of VBAC for women with no previous vaginal deliveries remains poor.
KW - Cesarean section
KW - pregnancy
KW - vaginal birth after cesarean section
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84944930211&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3109/14767058.2015.1099156
DO - 10.3109/14767058.2015.1099156
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 26399162
AN - SCOPUS:84944930211
SN - 1476-7058
VL - 29
SP - 2665
EP - 2670
JO - Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine
JF - Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine
IS - 16
ER -