Posttransplant cyclophosphamide-based anti–graft-vs-host disease prophylaxis in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated in complete remission with allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation from human leukocyte antigen-mismatched unrelated donors versus haploidentical donors: A study on behalf of the ALWP of the EBMT

Arnon Nagler*, Myriam Labopin, Mutlu Arat, Péter Reményi, Yener Koc, Didier Blaise, Emanuele Angelucci, Jan Vydra, Aleksandr Kulagin, Gerard Socié, Montserrat Rovira, Simona Sica, Mahmoud Aljurf, Zafer Gülbas, Nicolaus Kröger, Eolia Brissot, Zinaida Peric, Sebastian Giebel, Fabio Ciceri, Mohamad Mohty

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Both mismatched unrelated donor (MMUD) and haploidentical (haplo) transplantation are valid options in patients with high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) lacking a matched donor. Methods: The study compared the outcomes of adult patients with ALL in complete remission (CR) who underwent 9/10 MMUD versus haplo transplantation with posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) as graft-vs-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis in 2010–2020. Results: The study included 781 patients (MMUD, 103; haplo, 678). The median age was 40 (19–73) and 38 (18–75) years, respectively (p =.51). The most frequent immunosuppression agents added to PTCy were mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)/cyclosporine A and MMF/tacrolimus. In vivo T-cell depletion (anti-thymocyte globulin) was administered to 21% and 8% of the transplants, respectively (p <.0001). Neutrophil (absolute neutrophil count >0.5 × 109/L) recovery was achieved in 97.1% versus 96.7% versus (p = 1) in MMUD and haplo, respectively. Nonrelapse mortality and relapse incidence were not significantly different between MMUD and haplo, hazard ratio (HR) = 1.45 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.81–2.62; p =.21) and HR = 0.81 (95% CI, 0.52–1.28, p =.38), respectively. HRs for leukemia-free survival, overall survival, and GVHD-free, relapse-free survival were respectively, HR = 1.05 (95% CI, 0.73–1.50, p =.8), HR = 1.17 (95% CI, 0.77–1.76, p =.46), and HR = 1.07 (95% CI, 0.78–1.46, p =.7) for haplo compared to MMUD. Acute (a)GVHD grade 2–4 was significantly higher with haplo, HR = 1.73 (95% CI, 1.08–2.76, p =.023), whereas aGVHD grade 3–4 and chronic GVHD did not differ significantly between the two transplant groups. Conclusion: Outcomes of MMUD and haplo transplants with PTCy-based GVHD prophylaxis for ALL patients in CR are similar, apart from a higher incidence of aGVHD with haplo transplants.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3959-3968
Number of pages10
JournalCancer
Volume128
Issue number22
DOIs
StatePublished - 15 Nov 2022
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • acute lymphoblastic leukemia
  • allogeneic stem cell transplantation
  • graft versus host disease
  • haploidentical
  • mismatched unrelated donors
  • posttransplant cyclophosphamide

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Posttransplant cyclophosphamide-based anti–graft-vs-host disease prophylaxis in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated in complete remission with allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation from human leukocyte antigen-mismatched unrelated donors versus haploidentical donors: A study on behalf of the ALWP of the EBMT'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this