TY - JOUR
T1 - Posttransplant cyclophosphamide-based anti–graft-vs-host disease prophylaxis in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated in complete remission with allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation from human leukocyte antigen-mismatched unrelated donors versus haploidentical donors
T2 - A study on behalf of the ALWP of the EBMT
AU - Nagler, Arnon
AU - Labopin, Myriam
AU - Arat, Mutlu
AU - Reményi, Péter
AU - Koc, Yener
AU - Blaise, Didier
AU - Angelucci, Emanuele
AU - Vydra, Jan
AU - Kulagin, Aleksandr
AU - Socié, Gerard
AU - Rovira, Montserrat
AU - Sica, Simona
AU - Aljurf, Mahmoud
AU - Gülbas, Zafer
AU - Kröger, Nicolaus
AU - Brissot, Eolia
AU - Peric, Zinaida
AU - Giebel, Sebastian
AU - Ciceri, Fabio
AU - Mohty, Mohamad
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 American Cancer Society.
PY - 2022/11/15
Y1 - 2022/11/15
N2 - Background: Both mismatched unrelated donor (MMUD) and haploidentical (haplo) transplantation are valid options in patients with high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) lacking a matched donor. Methods: The study compared the outcomes of adult patients with ALL in complete remission (CR) who underwent 9/10 MMUD versus haplo transplantation with posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) as graft-vs-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis in 2010–2020. Results: The study included 781 patients (MMUD, 103; haplo, 678). The median age was 40 (19–73) and 38 (18–75) years, respectively (p =.51). The most frequent immunosuppression agents added to PTCy were mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)/cyclosporine A and MMF/tacrolimus. In vivo T-cell depletion (anti-thymocyte globulin) was administered to 21% and 8% of the transplants, respectively (p <.0001). Neutrophil (absolute neutrophil count >0.5 × 109/L) recovery was achieved in 97.1% versus 96.7% versus (p = 1) in MMUD and haplo, respectively. Nonrelapse mortality and relapse incidence were not significantly different between MMUD and haplo, hazard ratio (HR) = 1.45 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.81–2.62; p =.21) and HR = 0.81 (95% CI, 0.52–1.28, p =.38), respectively. HRs for leukemia-free survival, overall survival, and GVHD-free, relapse-free survival were respectively, HR = 1.05 (95% CI, 0.73–1.50, p =.8), HR = 1.17 (95% CI, 0.77–1.76, p =.46), and HR = 1.07 (95% CI, 0.78–1.46, p =.7) for haplo compared to MMUD. Acute (a)GVHD grade 2–4 was significantly higher with haplo, HR = 1.73 (95% CI, 1.08–2.76, p =.023), whereas aGVHD grade 3–4 and chronic GVHD did not differ significantly between the two transplant groups. Conclusion: Outcomes of MMUD and haplo transplants with PTCy-based GVHD prophylaxis for ALL patients in CR are similar, apart from a higher incidence of aGVHD with haplo transplants.
AB - Background: Both mismatched unrelated donor (MMUD) and haploidentical (haplo) transplantation are valid options in patients with high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) lacking a matched donor. Methods: The study compared the outcomes of adult patients with ALL in complete remission (CR) who underwent 9/10 MMUD versus haplo transplantation with posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) as graft-vs-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis in 2010–2020. Results: The study included 781 patients (MMUD, 103; haplo, 678). The median age was 40 (19–73) and 38 (18–75) years, respectively (p =.51). The most frequent immunosuppression agents added to PTCy were mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)/cyclosporine A and MMF/tacrolimus. In vivo T-cell depletion (anti-thymocyte globulin) was administered to 21% and 8% of the transplants, respectively (p <.0001). Neutrophil (absolute neutrophil count >0.5 × 109/L) recovery was achieved in 97.1% versus 96.7% versus (p = 1) in MMUD and haplo, respectively. Nonrelapse mortality and relapse incidence were not significantly different between MMUD and haplo, hazard ratio (HR) = 1.45 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.81–2.62; p =.21) and HR = 0.81 (95% CI, 0.52–1.28, p =.38), respectively. HRs for leukemia-free survival, overall survival, and GVHD-free, relapse-free survival were respectively, HR = 1.05 (95% CI, 0.73–1.50, p =.8), HR = 1.17 (95% CI, 0.77–1.76, p =.46), and HR = 1.07 (95% CI, 0.78–1.46, p =.7) for haplo compared to MMUD. Acute (a)GVHD grade 2–4 was significantly higher with haplo, HR = 1.73 (95% CI, 1.08–2.76, p =.023), whereas aGVHD grade 3–4 and chronic GVHD did not differ significantly between the two transplant groups. Conclusion: Outcomes of MMUD and haplo transplants with PTCy-based GVHD prophylaxis for ALL patients in CR are similar, apart from a higher incidence of aGVHD with haplo transplants.
KW - acute lymphoblastic leukemia
KW - allogeneic stem cell transplantation
KW - graft versus host disease
KW - haploidentical
KW - mismatched unrelated donors
KW - posttransplant cyclophosphamide
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85137975097&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/cncr.34452
DO - 10.1002/cncr.34452
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 36110063
AN - SCOPUS:85137975097
SN - 0008-543X
VL - 128
SP - 3959
EP - 3968
JO - Cancer
JF - Cancer
IS - 22
ER -