Postoperative lomefloxacin 0.3% prophylaxis in strabismus surgery

Moshe Snir*, Murat Hasanreisoglu, Ronit Friling, Nitza Goldenberg-Cohen, Rita Ehrlich, Judith Bagan, Ruth Axer-Siegel

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy of topical lomefloxacin 0.3% versus chloramphenicol 0.2% with polymyxin B 2500 U/ml in the treatment of patients after strabismus surgery. Methods: Seventy-nine consecutive patients who underwent strabismus surgery from April through October 2006 were randomized to receive topical lomefloxacin 0.3% (n = 45, 58 eyes) or chloramphenicol 0.2% with polymyxin B 2500 U/ml (n = 34, 40 eyes) postoperatively, in addition to topical dexamethasone 0.1% and diclophenac 0.1%. The groups were compared for clinical signs of local cellulitis and findings on conjunctival cultures. Results: From postoperative day 1 to day 28, rates of chemosis decreased from 96% to 9.5% in the lomefloxacin group and from 94% to zero in the chloramphenicol group; rates of hyperemia decreased from 100% to zero in both groups. Accordingly, rates of a cumulative clinical sign score (CCSS) decreased from 60% to zero in the lomefloxacin group and 50% to zero in the chloramphenicol group. Rates of positive bacterial cultures dropped from 59.6% preoperatively to 48.3% on day 14 in the lomefloxacin group and from 63% to 47% in the chloramphenicol group. Conclusions: Topical lomefloxacin is a potent alternative to topical chloramphenicol eye drops after strabismus surgery for the control of pain, infection and discharge, chemosis, hyperemia, and conjunctival hemorrhage.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)819-825
Number of pages7
JournalCurrent Eye Research
Volume33
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2008

Keywords

  • Chloramphenicol 0.2%
  • Lomefloxacin 0.3%
  • Strabismus surgery

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Postoperative lomefloxacin 0.3% prophylaxis in strabismus surgery'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this