Popper and the establishment

Nimrod Bar-Am*, Joseph Agassi

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

The central thesis of Karl Popper's philosophy is that intellectual and political progress are best achieved by not deferring to dogmatic authority. His philosophy of science is a plea for the replacement of classic dogmatic methodology with critical debate. His philosophy of politics, similarly, is a plea for replacing utopian social and political engineering with a more fallibilist, piecemeal variety. Many confuse his anti-dogmatism with relativism, and his anti-authoritarianism with Cold War conservatism or even with libertarian politics. Not so: he showed a clear preference for the ideal of truth over relativist complacency, for cosmopolitanism over nationalism, and for democratic control over unbridled capitalism.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)13-23
Number of pages11
JournalCritical Review
Volume17
Issue number1-2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2005

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Popper and the establishment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this