TY - JOUR
T1 - Plantar fasciitis
T2 - Detection with ultrasonography versus bone scintigraphy
AU - Groshar, D.
AU - Alperson, M.
AU - Toubi, A.
AU - Gorenberg, M.
AU - Liberson, A.
AU - Bar-Meir, E.
PY - 2000
Y1 - 2000
N2 - Purpose: To compare ultrasonography (US) with three-phase bone scintigraphy (BS) for detection of plantar fasciitis (PF). Materials and methods: Forty-three consecutive patients with a clinical diagnosis of PF were prospectively studied with US and BS. There were 58 symptomatic feet and 28 asymptomatic feet US positive findings for PF were thickness of the proximal plantar fascia> 3.9 mm (T) and hypoechoic fascia (H). Focal uptake at the medial calcaneus tuberosity in the early and delayed images were used as BS positive findings for PF. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) methodology was used to analyze the results. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy in diagnosis of plantar fasciitis were calculated for both modalities. Results: The mean area under the ROC curve, indicating successful diagnosis of PF, was 81.6% for BS, 76.5% for T and 81.8% for H (P> 0.25). The sensitivities were 77.6%, 74.1% and 70.7%, respectively for BS, T, and H (P>0.39). The specificity of BS (85.7%) did not differ significantly from the specificity of H (92.9%, p=0.20). Plantar fascia thickness specificity (71.4%) was significantly lower than BS (P=0.038) and H (P=0.0000). There were no statistically significant differences between positive and negative predictive values. Also, in 10 patients (23%), other causes of foot pain were found by BS. Conclusion: US and BS demonstrate no statistically significant difference in ability to demonstrate plantar fasciitis in patients with heel pain. (C) 2000 Harcourt Publishers Ltd.
AB - Purpose: To compare ultrasonography (US) with three-phase bone scintigraphy (BS) for detection of plantar fasciitis (PF). Materials and methods: Forty-three consecutive patients with a clinical diagnosis of PF were prospectively studied with US and BS. There were 58 symptomatic feet and 28 asymptomatic feet US positive findings for PF were thickness of the proximal plantar fascia> 3.9 mm (T) and hypoechoic fascia (H). Focal uptake at the medial calcaneus tuberosity in the early and delayed images were used as BS positive findings for PF. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) methodology was used to analyze the results. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy in diagnosis of plantar fasciitis were calculated for both modalities. Results: The mean area under the ROC curve, indicating successful diagnosis of PF, was 81.6% for BS, 76.5% for T and 81.8% for H (P> 0.25). The sensitivities were 77.6%, 74.1% and 70.7%, respectively for BS, T, and H (P>0.39). The specificity of BS (85.7%) did not differ significantly from the specificity of H (92.9%, p=0.20). Plantar fascia thickness specificity (71.4%) was significantly lower than BS (P=0.038) and H (P=0.0000). There were no statistically significant differences between positive and negative predictive values. Also, in 10 patients (23%), other causes of foot pain were found by BS. Conclusion: US and BS demonstrate no statistically significant difference in ability to demonstrate plantar fasciitis in patients with heel pain. (C) 2000 Harcourt Publishers Ltd.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033831918&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1054/foot.2000.0621
DO - 10.1054/foot.2000.0621
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:0033831918
SN - 0958-2592
VL - 10
SP - 164
EP - 168
JO - Foot
JF - Foot
IS - 3
ER -