Placental histopathology differences and neonatal outcome in dichorionic–diamniotic as compared to monochorionic–diamniotic twin pregnancies

Eran Weiner*, Elad Barber, Ohad Feldstein, Ann Dekalo, Letizia Schreiber, Jacob Bar, Michal Kovo

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

13 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: We aimed to compare the differences in placental histopathology lesions and pregnancy outcome in dichorionic– diamniotic (DCDA) versus uncomplicated monochorionic–diamniotic (MCDA) twin gestations. Study Design: Maternal characteristics, neonatal outcome, and placental histopathology reports of all twin deliveries between 24 and 41 weeks were reviewed. Excluded were pregnancies complicated by twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome, twin anemia–polycythemia sequence, selective intrauterine growth restriction, placenta previa, intrauterine fetal death, and malformation. Placental lesions were classified to maternal/fetal vascular malperfusion lesions. Umbilical cord abnormalities included hypo-/hypercoiling and abnormal insertion. Composite adverse neonatal outcome was defined as 1 or more early complications. Small for gestational age (SGA) was defined as birth weight ≤10th percentile. Results: The DCDA group (n = 362) was characterized by higher rates of assisted reproductive techniques (P <.001) and nulliparity (P =.03) as compared to the MCDA group (n = 65). Gestational age at delivery was similar between groups. Placental maternal vascular malperfusion lesions were more common in placentas from DCDA group (38.2% vs 23.1%; P =.016), while fetal vascular malperfusion lesions and abnormal cord insertion were more common in placentas from MCDA group (P =.027; P <.001). The SGA and composite adverse neonatal outcome were more common in the MCDA group (P =.031 and P =.038, respectively). By multivariate regression analysis, composite adverse neonatal outcome was found to be independently associated with the MCDA group, adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 1.2, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.04 to 1.89, P =.041, and with placental fetal malperfusion lesions aOR = 1.3, 95% CI = 1.1 to 2.09, P =.038. Conclusion: Placental pathology differs between MCDA and DCDA twin pregnancies. Adverse neonatal outcome in uncomplicated MCDA twins, as compared to DCDA twins, could be related to increased placental fetal malperfusion lesions and abnormal cord insertion.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1067-1072
Number of pages6
JournalReproductive Sciences
Volume25
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2018

Keywords

  • Dichorionic
  • Monochorionic
  • Neonatal outcome
  • Placental pathology
  • Twin pregnancies

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Placental histopathology differences and neonatal outcome in dichorionic–diamniotic as compared to monochorionic–diamniotic twin pregnancies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this