Physician ratings of pain descriptors: Potential diagnostic utility

Blake H. Tearnan, Reuven Dar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

A large sample of staff physicians and residents (n = 193) responded to a questionnaire in which they were asked to rate 10 pain descriptors for level of applicability to 4 common acute and chronic pain syndromes. The purpose of the study was to examine the extent to which physicians would agree on the ratings, and whether they would rate the descriptors in a way that would permit discriminations to be made between the pain syndromes. Physicians' opinions regarding the usefulness of pain descriptors and the effect of several practice-related variables on the usage of pain descriptors were also assessed. The results showed that physicians agreed on the ratings of the descriptors within pain syndromes, and that they rated the descriptors in a way that discriminated between pain syndromes. The ratings were not affected by specialty training, experience with pain patients, or amount of specialized training in pain. Physicians with more training in pain, however, considered the diagnostic utility of pain descriptors higher. For all physicians, the diagnostic utility of pain descriptors was rated higher for acute than for chronic pain. Other comparisons between acute and chronic pain revealed that acute pain was rated by physicians as more painful and more interfering with mood and physical activity. The implications of these findings are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)45-51
Number of pages7
JournalPain
Volume26
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1986
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Physician ratings of pain descriptors: Potential diagnostic utility'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this