Personal opinion: Treatment of vulvovaginal atrophy-are hidden interests and misinformation preventing better management?

A. Pines*, D. W. Sturdee

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Menopausal women very often complain of vulvovaginal atrophy (VVA)-related symptoms, which mainly include dryness, irritation, dyspareunia and pain. The ideal therapeutic approach is to use systemic or intravaginal estrogen, which has proved to be effective. However, because of safety concerns that were raised after the publication of the Womens Health Initiative data, non-estrogenic and non-hormonal therapies for VVA have been developed and heavily promoted. Many menopause specialists believe that the flow of information on the newer products indicated for VVA seems to include an inaccurate message, which downgrades the use of estrogenic preparations and upgrades modern non-estrogenic therapies. Both media and medical sources have created an atmosphere of exaggerated worries over intravaginal estrogen therapies, which are not substantiated by hard clinical facts.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)802-804
Number of pages3
JournalClimacteric
Volume18
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 2 Nov 2015

Keywords

  • Alternative Vaginal Therapies
  • Breast Cancer
  • Cardiovascular Disease
  • Endometrial Cancer
  • Intravaginal Estrogen
  • Menopause
  • Non-Estrogenic Therapies
  • Non-Hormonal Therapies
  • Topical Estrogen
  • Vulvovaginal Atrophy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Personal opinion: Treatment of vulvovaginal atrophy-are hidden interests and misinformation preventing better management?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this