TY - JOUR
T1 - Persistent abdominal pain over uterine scar during labor as a predictor of delivery complications
AU - Cohen, Aviad
AU - Cohen, Yoni
AU - Laskov, Ido
AU - Maslovitz, Sharon
AU - Lessing, Joseph B.
AU - Many, Ariel
PY - 2013/12
Y1 - 2013/12
N2 - Objective To evaluate the significance of persistent lower abdominal pain in women with previous cesarean delivery. Methods Various maternal outcomes were compared between women who underwent repeated cesareans owing to persistent lower abdominal pain (study group) and women who underwent repeated cesareans without persistent abdominal pain (control group). Results The incidence of uterine rupture was significantly higher in the study group than in the control group (8/81 [9.9%] vs 0/119 [0.0%]; P < 0.001). While all women with persistent lower abdominal pain and uterine rupture had an additional sign or symptom, only 6/73 (8.2%) women with persistent abdominal pain without uterine rupture had any additional symptoms (P < 0.001). There was no difference in incidence of uterine scar dehiscence between the groups. However, the hospitalization period was significantly longer in the study group (4 vs 3.7 days; P < 0.05). Trial of labor was a contributing factor to uterine rupture. Conclusion Isolated persistent lower abdominal pain in women with previous cesarean is a poor indicator of uterine rupture. However, the positive predictive value for uterine rupture is 57% when an additional sign or symptom is present. Dehiscence of the uterine scar is relatively common and it is not associated with persistent abdominal pain.
AB - Objective To evaluate the significance of persistent lower abdominal pain in women with previous cesarean delivery. Methods Various maternal outcomes were compared between women who underwent repeated cesareans owing to persistent lower abdominal pain (study group) and women who underwent repeated cesareans without persistent abdominal pain (control group). Results The incidence of uterine rupture was significantly higher in the study group than in the control group (8/81 [9.9%] vs 0/119 [0.0%]; P < 0.001). While all women with persistent lower abdominal pain and uterine rupture had an additional sign or symptom, only 6/73 (8.2%) women with persistent abdominal pain without uterine rupture had any additional symptoms (P < 0.001). There was no difference in incidence of uterine scar dehiscence between the groups. However, the hospitalization period was significantly longer in the study group (4 vs 3.7 days; P < 0.05). Trial of labor was a contributing factor to uterine rupture. Conclusion Isolated persistent lower abdominal pain in women with previous cesarean is a poor indicator of uterine rupture. However, the positive predictive value for uterine rupture is 57% when an additional sign or symptom is present. Dehiscence of the uterine scar is relatively common and it is not associated with persistent abdominal pain.
KW - Persistent abdominal pain
KW - Uterine rupture
KW - Uterine scar dehiscence
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84887084561&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.06.018
DO - 10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.06.018
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:84887084561
SN - 0020-7292
VL - 123
SP - 200
EP - 202
JO - International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics
JF - International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics
IS - 3
ER -