Pediatric thyroid nodules: Ultrasonographic characteristics and inter-observer variability in prediction of malignancy

Dror Koltin, Clodagh S. O'Gorman*, Amanda Murphy, Bo Ngan, Alan Daneman, Oscar M. Navarro, Cristian Garcia, Eshetu G. Atenafu, Jonathan D. Wasserman, Jill Hamilton, Marianna Rachmiel

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

25 Scopus citations

Abstract

Pediatric thyroid nodules, while uncommon, have high malignancy risk. The objectives of the study were (1) to identify sonographic features predictive of malignancy; (2) to create a prediction model; and (3) to assess inter-observer agreement among radiologists. Methods: All available cases of thyroid nodules, surgically removed between 2000 and 2009. Three radiologists reviewed the sonographic images; 2 pathologists reviewed the tissue specimens. Adult prediction models were applied. Interobserver variability was assessed. Results: Twenty-seven subjects, mean age 13.1±3.4 years, were included. Nineteen nodules were differentiated thyroid carcinomas. On multivariate analysis, size was the only significant predictor of malignancy. On recursive partitioning analysis, size >35 mm with microcalcification and ill-defined margins yielded the best prediction model. Radiologist inter-observer agreement regarding malignancy was moderate (κ=0.50). Conclusions: Larger size, microcalcifications and ill-defined margins on ultrasound demonstrate the best predictive model for malignancy in the pediatric population. Experienced pediatric radiologists demonstrate moderate inter-observer agreement in prediction of malignancy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)789-794
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Pediatric Endocrinology and Metabolism
Volume29
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jul 2016

Keywords

  • Inter-observer variability
  • prediction model
  • thyroid carcinoma
  • thyroid nodules
  • ultrasound

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Pediatric thyroid nodules: Ultrasonographic characteristics and inter-observer variability in prediction of malignancy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this