Patients' views of involuntary hospital admission after 1 and 3 months: Prospective study in 11 European countries

Stefan Priebe*, Christina Katsakou, Matthias Glöckner, Algirdas Dembinskas, Andrea Fiorillo, Anastasia Karastergiou, Andrzej Kiejna, Lars Kjellin, Pitr Nawka, George Onchev, Jiri Raboch, Matthias Schuetzwohl, Zahava Solomon, Francisco Torres-González, Duolao Wang, Thomas Kallert

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

99 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Legislation and practice of involuntary hospital admission vary substantially among European countries, but differences in outcomes have not been studied. Aims: To explore patients' views following involuntary hospitalisation in different European countries. Method: in a prospective study in 11 countries, 2326 consecutive involuntary patients admitted to psychiatric hospital departments were interviewed within 1 week of admission; 1809 were followed up 1 month and 1613 3 months later. Patients' views as to whether the admission was right were the outcome criterion. Results: In the different countries, between 39 and 71% felt the admission was right after 1 month, and between 46 and 86% after 3 months. Females, those living alone and those with a diagnosis of schizophrenia had more negative views. Adjusting for confounding factors, differences between countries were significant. Conclusions: International differences in legislation and practice may be relevant to outcomes and inform improvements in policies, particularly in countries with poorer outcomes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)179-185
Number of pages7
JournalBritish Journal of Psychiatry
Volume196
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2010

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Patients' views of involuntary hospital admission after 1 and 3 months: Prospective study in 11 European countries'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this