TY - JOUR
T1 - Patients' views of involuntary hospital admission after 1 and 3 months
T2 - Prospective study in 11 European countries
AU - Priebe, Stefan
AU - Katsakou, Christina
AU - Glöckner, Matthias
AU - Dembinskas, Algirdas
AU - Fiorillo, Andrea
AU - Karastergiou, Anastasia
AU - Kiejna, Andrzej
AU - Kjellin, Lars
AU - Nawka, Pitr
AU - Onchev, George
AU - Raboch, Jiri
AU - Schuetzwohl, Matthias
AU - Solomon, Zahava
AU - Torres-González, Francisco
AU - Wang, Duolao
AU - Kallert, Thomas
PY - 2010/3
Y1 - 2010/3
N2 - Background: Legislation and practice of involuntary hospital admission vary substantially among European countries, but differences in outcomes have not been studied. Aims: To explore patients' views following involuntary hospitalisation in different European countries. Method: in a prospective study in 11 countries, 2326 consecutive involuntary patients admitted to psychiatric hospital departments were interviewed within 1 week of admission; 1809 were followed up 1 month and 1613 3 months later. Patients' views as to whether the admission was right were the outcome criterion. Results: In the different countries, between 39 and 71% felt the admission was right after 1 month, and between 46 and 86% after 3 months. Females, those living alone and those with a diagnosis of schizophrenia had more negative views. Adjusting for confounding factors, differences between countries were significant. Conclusions: International differences in legislation and practice may be relevant to outcomes and inform improvements in policies, particularly in countries with poorer outcomes.
AB - Background: Legislation and practice of involuntary hospital admission vary substantially among European countries, but differences in outcomes have not been studied. Aims: To explore patients' views following involuntary hospitalisation in different European countries. Method: in a prospective study in 11 countries, 2326 consecutive involuntary patients admitted to psychiatric hospital departments were interviewed within 1 week of admission; 1809 were followed up 1 month and 1613 3 months later. Patients' views as to whether the admission was right were the outcome criterion. Results: In the different countries, between 39 and 71% felt the admission was right after 1 month, and between 46 and 86% after 3 months. Females, those living alone and those with a diagnosis of schizophrenia had more negative views. Adjusting for confounding factors, differences between countries were significant. Conclusions: International differences in legislation and practice may be relevant to outcomes and inform improvements in policies, particularly in countries with poorer outcomes.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/77749295710
U2 - 10.1192/bjp.bp.109.068916
DO - 10.1192/bjp.bp.109.068916
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 20194537
AN - SCOPUS:77749295710
SN - 0007-1250
VL - 196
SP - 179
EP - 185
JO - British Journal of Psychiatry
JF - British Journal of Psychiatry
IS - 3
ER -