TY - GEN
T1 - Passive and active leading edge devices on a simple swept back wing
AU - Phillips, Elisa
AU - Taubert, Lutz
AU - Wygnanski, Israel
AU - Menge, Moritz
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc, AIAA. All rights reserved.
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - Tests were carried out on a 45° swept back wing having several Aspect Ratios ( AR), but most of the presented results are concerned with a highly unstable, high AR wing. Test velocities ranged between 20-50m/s, depending on specific test needs (e.g. Pressure Sensitive Paint, PSP, required higher speed). The wing being based on a NACA0012 airfoil had a round leading edge that prevented the generation of a leading edge vortex prior to tip trailing edge stall, unless a protuberance like a vortilon or a snag were placed at the leading edge. The shape of the leading edge was modified in order to assess its significance. Interaction between the leading edge vortex and the trailing edge separated region resulted in non-linear pitch behavior that was controlled by passive and active means. At larger incidence angles the leading edge vortex propagated inboard and the trailing edge separated region moved upstream requiring a change in the control strategy in order to remain effective. Balance results, flow visualization and Pressure Sensitive Paint show how to force the downstream turn of the leading edge vortex in order to control its path and its effect on pitch-up.
AB - Tests were carried out on a 45° swept back wing having several Aspect Ratios ( AR), but most of the presented results are concerned with a highly unstable, high AR wing. Test velocities ranged between 20-50m/s, depending on specific test needs (e.g. Pressure Sensitive Paint, PSP, required higher speed). The wing being based on a NACA0012 airfoil had a round leading edge that prevented the generation of a leading edge vortex prior to tip trailing edge stall, unless a protuberance like a vortilon or a snag were placed at the leading edge. The shape of the leading edge was modified in order to assess its significance. Interaction between the leading edge vortex and the trailing edge separated region resulted in non-linear pitch behavior that was controlled by passive and active means. At larger incidence angles the leading edge vortex propagated inboard and the trailing edge separated region moved upstream requiring a change in the control strategy in order to remain effective. Balance results, flow visualization and Pressure Sensitive Paint show how to force the downstream turn of the leading edge vortex in order to control its path and its effect on pitch-up.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85086027219&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2514/6.2019-3393
DO - 10.2514/6.2019-3393
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontobookanthology.conference???
AN - SCOPUS:85086027219
SN - 9781624105890
T3 - AIAA Aviation 2019 Forum
SP - 1
EP - 18
BT - AIAA Aviation 2019 Forum
PB - American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc, AIAA
Y2 - 17 June 2019 through 21 June 2019
ER -