Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Parturients with diabetes and associated outcomes with Macrosomic newborns

  • Fabrizio Zullo
  • , Teresa C. Logue
  • , Daniele Di Mascio
  • , Giuseppe Rizzo
  • , Antonella Giancotti
  • , Matthew K. Hoffman
  • , Sara Sorrenti
  • , Hector Mendez Figueroa
  • , Anthony C. Sciscione
  • , Michal Fishel Bartal
  • , Suneet P. Chauhan*
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Christiana Care Health System
  • University of Rome La Sapienza
  • University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
  • Tel Aviv University
  • Delaware Center of Maternal-Fetal Medicine

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Adverse neonatal and maternal outcomes are understudied for parturients with diabetes who deliver macrosomic newborns. Objective: We hypothesized that composite-neonatal (CNAO) and maternal adverse outcomes (CMAO) would be significantly higher for individuals with diabetes macrosomic newborns. Study Design: This was a secondary analysis of APEX cohorts. The inclusion criteria were parturients with diabetes that were at least 34.0 weeks. CNAO included: Apgar score < 7 at 5 min, neonatal fracture, intracranial hemorrhage, neonatal brachial plexus palsy (NBPP), treated hypotension, or hypoxic encelopathy. CMAO included: chorioamnionitis, EBL ≥ 1,000 mL or 3rd/4th degree lacerations. Multivariate Poisson regression with robust error variance was used to calculate incidence-rate-ratios (IRR), and adjusted IRR (aIRR) Results: Among the 118,422 cohorts in APEX study, 8,410(7.5 %) had diabetes. The inclusion criteria were met by 584 (6.9 %) diabetic parturients, and among them 491 (84.0 %) delivered category I macrosomia, and 93 (16.0 %) with category II/III. The overall CNAO was 7.2 %, and it was significantly higher for parturients who delivered newborns with BW ≥ 4,500 g (15.0%) versus 4,000–4,499 g (5.7%; aIRR2.64; 95 %-CI 1.39–5.01; p: 0.006). The overall CMAO was 29.9 % and it was similar when BW ≥ 4,500 g (32.2 %) versus when BW was 4,000–4,499 (29.5 %; aIRR 1.05; 0.71–1.57). The overall rate of shoulder dystocia (SD) among macrosomic newborns was 14.7 % and it was significantly higher among those with birthweight ≥ 4,500g (28.0%) versus those with 4,000–4,449 g (12.2 %; aIRR2.21; 95 %CI 1.39–3.53). The rate of cesarean delivery did not differ between the two groups(aIRR 1.24;95 % CI 0.89–1.72). Conclusions: Among parturients with diabetes, who delivered newborns with birthweight ≥ 4,500 g versus 4,000–4,499 g, CNAO and SD were twofold higher. Thus, there is an imperative to identify newborns among individuals with diabetes whose newborn will be 4,000–4,499 versus ≥ 4,500 g.

Original languageEnglish
Article number114598
JournalEuropean Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
Volume313
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2025

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • APEX cohort
  • Birthweight thresholds
  • Cesarean delivery
  • Composite outcomes
  • Gestational diabetes
  • Macrosomia complications
  • Maternal morbidity
  • Neonatal brachial plexus palsy
  • Perinatal outcomes
  • Shoulder dystocia

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Parturients with diabetes and associated outcomes with Macrosomic newborns'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this