TY - JOUR
T1 - Parents who refuse to vaccinate their infants
T2 - Paediatricians' feelings and treatment intentions
AU - Maayan-Metzger, A.
AU - Kedem-Friedrich, P.
AU - Ben-Namer-Basseches, M.
AU - Kuint, J.
PY - 2013/12
Y1 - 2013/12
N2 - Aim The aim of this study was to evaluate paediatricians' attitudes and emotions towards parents who refuse to vaccinate their infants and to assess their reactions, suggestions and practices. Design The study group consisted of 376 paediatricians in Israel, who completed the emailed research questionnaire anonymously. Results Although the vast majority of paediatricians agreed that vaccination was in the baby's best interest (92.2%), only a small percentage (3.5%) felt that there should be some scientific justification behind a parent's refusal. The majority (70.7%) of those surveyed expressed negative feelings towards refusing parents. Despite this, more than a third (36.9%) agreed that parents have the right to decide (28.9% disagreed) and a third (36.8%) agreed that vaccinations should be officially enforced (35.8% disagreed). Only a very small percentage of the paediatricians (1.8%) said they would object to treating infants who had not been vaccinated. Conclusion Paediatricians face a conflict between two opposing values: the importance of immunization versus the parents' rights to decide what is best for their own child. Therefore, they are in favour of gentle persuasion or official enforcement. We believe that experts in modern communication could help paediatricians to convey the positive benefits of vaccination to parents.
AB - Aim The aim of this study was to evaluate paediatricians' attitudes and emotions towards parents who refuse to vaccinate their infants and to assess their reactions, suggestions and practices. Design The study group consisted of 376 paediatricians in Israel, who completed the emailed research questionnaire anonymously. Results Although the vast majority of paediatricians agreed that vaccination was in the baby's best interest (92.2%), only a small percentage (3.5%) felt that there should be some scientific justification behind a parent's refusal. The majority (70.7%) of those surveyed expressed negative feelings towards refusing parents. Despite this, more than a third (36.9%) agreed that parents have the right to decide (28.9% disagreed) and a third (36.8%) agreed that vaccinations should be officially enforced (35.8% disagreed). Only a very small percentage of the paediatricians (1.8%) said they would object to treating infants who had not been vaccinated. Conclusion Paediatricians face a conflict between two opposing values: the importance of immunization versus the parents' rights to decide what is best for their own child. Therefore, they are in favour of gentle persuasion or official enforcement. We believe that experts in modern communication could help paediatricians to convey the positive benefits of vaccination to parents.
KW - Immunization
KW - Infant vaccination
KW - Paediatricians' attitudes and practices
KW - Refusing parents
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84887489035&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/apa.12397
DO - 10.1111/apa.12397
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:84887489035
SN - 0803-5253
VL - 102
SP - 1186
EP - 1191
JO - Acta Paediatrica, International Journal of Paediatrics
JF - Acta Paediatrica, International Journal of Paediatrics
IS - 12
ER -