TY - JOUR
T1 - Pacemaker implantation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation
AU - Goldenberg, Gustavo
AU - Kusniec, Jairo
AU - Kadmon, Ehud
AU - Golovchiner, Gregory
AU - Zabarsky, Ronit
AU - Nevzorov, Roman
AU - Vaknin, Hana
AU - Assali, Abed
AU - Kornowski, Ran
AU - Haim, Moti
AU - Strasberg, Boris
PY - 2013/11/15
Y1 - 2013/11/15
N2 - Thirty- to 35% of patients after transcatheter aortic valve implantation undergo implantation of a permanent pacemaker (PPM) because of development of atrioventricular block (AVB) or development of a condition with high risk of progression to AVB. There are insufficient data regarding long-term follow-up on pacing dependency. From February 2009 to July 2011, 191 transcatheter aortic valve implantation procedures were performed at the Rabin Medical Center (125 CoreValve and 66 Edwards SAPIEN). Thirty-two patients (16.7%) received a PPM (30 with CoreValve and 2 with Edwards SAPIEN). Data from the pacemaker clinic follow-up was available in 27 patients. After a mean follow-up of 52 weeks (range, 22 to 103), only 8 (29%) of 27 patients were pacing dependent. The indication of PPM in these 8 patients was complete AVB. In conclusion, in our center, the rate of PPM implantation was 16%, which is lower than that reported in the published works. Only 29% of those patients implanted with PPM were pacemaker dependent. Further studies are necessary to define reliable predictors for long-term pacing.
AB - Thirty- to 35% of patients after transcatheter aortic valve implantation undergo implantation of a permanent pacemaker (PPM) because of development of atrioventricular block (AVB) or development of a condition with high risk of progression to AVB. There are insufficient data regarding long-term follow-up on pacing dependency. From February 2009 to July 2011, 191 transcatheter aortic valve implantation procedures were performed at the Rabin Medical Center (125 CoreValve and 66 Edwards SAPIEN). Thirty-two patients (16.7%) received a PPM (30 with CoreValve and 2 with Edwards SAPIEN). Data from the pacemaker clinic follow-up was available in 27 patients. After a mean follow-up of 52 weeks (range, 22 to 103), only 8 (29%) of 27 patients were pacing dependent. The indication of PPM in these 8 patients was complete AVB. In conclusion, in our center, the rate of PPM implantation was 16%, which is lower than that reported in the published works. Only 29% of those patients implanted with PPM were pacemaker dependent. Further studies are necessary to define reliable predictors for long-term pacing.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84887017935&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.07.022
DO - 10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.07.022
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:84887017935
SN - 0002-9149
VL - 112
SP - 1632
EP - 1634
JO - American Journal of Cardiology
JF - American Journal of Cardiology
IS - 10
ER -