TY - JOUR
T1 - Overcoming local anesthesia failure during routine dental treatments in children
AU - Yagudaev, Michael
AU - Yarom, Noam
AU - Ashkenazi, Malka
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 BSPD, IAPD and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
PY - 2024/9
Y1 - 2024/9
N2 - Background: Local anesthesia (LA) during routine dental treatment in children fails in 5%–35% of first attempts. No data, however, are available on the success rates of subsequent attempts. Aim: To evaluate the effectiveness of primary, secondary, and tertiary LA attempts (P-LA, S-LA, and T-LA, respectively) for anesthetizing molars during routine dental treatments in children. Design: We retrospectively analyzed dental records of all children (2–18 years) who had been administered LA for the treatment of primary or permanent molars by a single paediatric dentist, between 2011 and 2022. All LAs were delivered using a computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery (CCLAD) system. Results: The failure rate of P-LA in 1312 molars was 13% and correlated with age (p <.001), type of tooth (p <.001), type of treatment (p <.001), and treated arch (p <.001). The effectiveness of S-LA for buccal infiltration, intrasulcular, inferior alveolar nerve block, greater palatine nerve block (GPNB), posterior superior alveolar nerve block (PSANB), or a combination of the last two was 50%, 87.2%, 66.7%, 63.6%, 33.3%, and 100%, respectively, and was not significantly associated with age or the type of tooth, treatment, or P-LA. Conclusion: The optimal choice of S-LA for anesthetizing maxillary molars was a combination of PSANB and GPNB, whereas for mandibular molars, it was IS-CCLAD system.
AB - Background: Local anesthesia (LA) during routine dental treatment in children fails in 5%–35% of first attempts. No data, however, are available on the success rates of subsequent attempts. Aim: To evaluate the effectiveness of primary, secondary, and tertiary LA attempts (P-LA, S-LA, and T-LA, respectively) for anesthetizing molars during routine dental treatments in children. Design: We retrospectively analyzed dental records of all children (2–18 years) who had been administered LA for the treatment of primary or permanent molars by a single paediatric dentist, between 2011 and 2022. All LAs were delivered using a computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery (CCLAD) system. Results: The failure rate of P-LA in 1312 molars was 13% and correlated with age (p <.001), type of tooth (p <.001), type of treatment (p <.001), and treated arch (p <.001). The effectiveness of S-LA for buccal infiltration, intrasulcular, inferior alveolar nerve block, greater palatine nerve block (GPNB), posterior superior alveolar nerve block (PSANB), or a combination of the last two was 50%, 87.2%, 66.7%, 63.6%, 33.3%, and 100%, respectively, and was not significantly associated with age or the type of tooth, treatment, or P-LA. Conclusion: The optimal choice of S-LA for anesthetizing maxillary molars was a combination of PSANB and GPNB, whereas for mandibular molars, it was IS-CCLAD system.
KW - extraction
KW - infiltration
KW - intrasulcular
KW - nerve block
KW - pain
KW - restoration
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85186608854&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/ipd.13169
DO - 10.1111/ipd.13169
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 38409510
AN - SCOPUS:85186608854
SN - 0960-7439
VL - 34
SP - 680
EP - 691
JO - International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry
JF - International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry
IS - 5
ER -