Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Patients With Low Versus Intermediate to High Surgical Risk

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

9 Scopus citations

Abstract

Referral of low surgical risk (LSR) patients for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) becomes common in multiple tertiary centers, and clinical trial data for this population are not available to date. We performed a retrospective analysis on an Israeli multicenter registry. LSR and intermediate-high surgical risk (I-HSR) were defined by a Society of Thoracic Surgery score of <4% and ≥4%, respectively. The cohort included 2336 patients (LSR n = 1198, I-HLR n = 1138). As compared with LSR, patients with I-HSR were older and had significantly higher rates of baseline comorbidities. Although devices success rates (94% vs 96%), paravalvular leak (3.5% vs 5.2%), and permanent pacemaker implantation (17.2 vs 18%) were comparable (p >0.05 for all comparisons), the safety outcome at 1 month (12.7% vs 9.8%), procedural mortality (1.9% vs 0.6%), and mortality at 3 years (30.1% vs 16.1%) were higher in patients with I-HSR (p <0.05 for all comparisons). In a subanalysis of patients with very LSR, comparable rates of device success and safety outcomes were observed, whereas mortality at 1 to 3 years was lower. In conclusion, although procedural outcomes were comparable between LSR and I-HSR TAVI patients, the rates of short- and long-term mortality, as well as the safety outcome, were lower in LSR patients.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)644-649
Number of pages6
JournalAmerican Journal of Cardiology
Volume123
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 15 Feb 2019

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Patients With Low Versus Intermediate to High Surgical Risk'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this