TY - JOUR
T1 - Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Patients With Low Versus Intermediate to High Surgical Risk
AU - Finkelstein, Ariel
AU - Rozenbaum, Zach
AU - Halkin, Amir
AU - Banai, Shmuel
AU - Bazan, Samuel
AU - Barbash, Israel
AU - Segev, Amit
AU - Fefer, Paul
AU - Maor, Elad
AU - Danenberg, Haim
AU - Planner, David
AU - Orvin, Katia
AU - Assa, Hana Vaknin
AU - Assali, Abid
AU - Kornowski, Ran
AU - Steinvil, Arie
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018
PY - 2019/2/15
Y1 - 2019/2/15
N2 - Referral of low surgical risk (LSR) patients for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) becomes common in multiple tertiary centers, and clinical trial data for this population are not available to date. We performed a retrospective analysis on an Israeli multicenter registry. LSR and intermediate-high surgical risk (I-HSR) were defined by a Society of Thoracic Surgery score of <4% and ≥4%, respectively. The cohort included 2336 patients (LSR n = 1198, I-HLR n = 1138). As compared with LSR, patients with I-HSR were older and had significantly higher rates of baseline comorbidities. Although devices success rates (94% vs 96%), paravalvular leak (3.5% vs 5.2%), and permanent pacemaker implantation (17.2 vs 18%) were comparable (p >0.05 for all comparisons), the safety outcome at 1 month (12.7% vs 9.8%), procedural mortality (1.9% vs 0.6%), and mortality at 3 years (30.1% vs 16.1%) were higher in patients with I-HSR (p <0.05 for all comparisons). In a subanalysis of patients with very LSR, comparable rates of device success and safety outcomes were observed, whereas mortality at 1 to 3 years was lower. In conclusion, although procedural outcomes were comparable between LSR and I-HSR TAVI patients, the rates of short- and long-term mortality, as well as the safety outcome, were lower in LSR patients.
AB - Referral of low surgical risk (LSR) patients for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) becomes common in multiple tertiary centers, and clinical trial data for this population are not available to date. We performed a retrospective analysis on an Israeli multicenter registry. LSR and intermediate-high surgical risk (I-HSR) were defined by a Society of Thoracic Surgery score of <4% and ≥4%, respectively. The cohort included 2336 patients (LSR n = 1198, I-HLR n = 1138). As compared with LSR, patients with I-HSR were older and had significantly higher rates of baseline comorbidities. Although devices success rates (94% vs 96%), paravalvular leak (3.5% vs 5.2%), and permanent pacemaker implantation (17.2 vs 18%) were comparable (p >0.05 for all comparisons), the safety outcome at 1 month (12.7% vs 9.8%), procedural mortality (1.9% vs 0.6%), and mortality at 3 years (30.1% vs 16.1%) were higher in patients with I-HSR (p <0.05 for all comparisons). In a subanalysis of patients with very LSR, comparable rates of device success and safety outcomes were observed, whereas mortality at 1 to 3 years was lower. In conclusion, although procedural outcomes were comparable between LSR and I-HSR TAVI patients, the rates of short- and long-term mortality, as well as the safety outcome, were lower in LSR patients.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85057784813&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.amjcard.2018.11.010
DO - 10.1016/j.amjcard.2018.11.010
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 30528420
AN - SCOPUS:85057784813
SN - 0002-9149
VL - 123
SP - 644
EP - 649
JO - American Journal of Cardiology
JF - American Journal of Cardiology
IS - 4
ER -