Outcomes of refractive error correction in pseudophakic patients using a sulcus piggyback intraocular lens

Eliya Levinger, Michael Mimouni*, Yaron Finkelman, Yossi Yatziv, Jonathan Shahar, Omer Trivizki

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

9 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to assess the results of a sulcus intraocular lens (Sulcoflex) for pseudophakic refractive errors following phacoemulsification cataract surgery. Methods: This retrospective clinical observational cohort study included consecutive eyes in which a Sulcoflex was implanted. Uncorrected distance visual acuity and corrected distance visual acuity as well as refractive outcomes were assessed. The minimum follow-up time required for inclusion was 3 months. Results: In total, 15 eyes (n = 15) were evaluated. The mean follow-up was 14 months (range: 3–18 months). The Sulcoflex aspheric (653L) was implanted in 13 eyes and the Sulcoflex toric (653T) in two eyes. The preoperative mean logMAR (Snellen) uncorrected distance visual acuity and corrected distance visual acuity were 0.88 (20/150) and 0.27 (20/40), respectively. The postoperative mean logMAR (Snellen) corrected distance visual acuity was 0.15 (20/30). The preoperative mean spherical equivalent was −0.22 ± 5.95 D and the postoperative mean spherical equivalent was −1.59 ± 1.45 D. There was a significant and strong correlation (r = 0.64, p < 0.001) between the attempted and the achieved spherical equivalent. Conclusion: The Sulcoflex is a safe and viable option for patients with residual refractive error following cataract surgery.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)422-426
Number of pages5
JournalEuropean Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume31
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2021

Keywords

  • Piggyback
  • Sulcoflexs
  • intraocular
  • lens
  • sulcus

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Outcomes of refractive error correction in pseudophakic patients using a sulcus piggyback intraocular lens'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this