TY - JOUR
T1 - Outcomes following Laser Retinopexy for Retinal Tears
T2 - A Comparative Study between Trainees and Specialists
AU - Lankry, Polina
AU - Loewenstein, Anat
AU - Moisseiev, Elad
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 S. Karger AG. All rights reserved.
PY - 2020/8/1
Y1 - 2020/8/1
N2 - Objective: To compare the outcomes of laser retinopexy for the treatment of retinal tears between residents and specialists, and to identify tear characteristics associated with the risk of progression to retinal detachment (RD). Methods: A retrospective review of 307 eyes treated by laser retinopexy, categorized by the performing physician, either a resident (217 cases) or a specialist (90 cases). Recorded parameters included the number, size, and location of the retinal tears, the presence of bridging vessels, vitreous hemorrhage (VH), or subretinal fluid (SRF), the need for additional laser, progression to RD, and surgery. Results: Additional laser was performed in 42.3%of cases in the resident group and 35.5%in the specialist group (p = 0.26). Progression to RD occurred in 6.9%of cases in the resident group and 5.5%in the specialist group (p = 0.66). The presence of VH and SRF were associated with an increased risk of progression to RD (p < 0.0001 and 0.003, respectively). A higher proportion of cases with SRF were treated by specialists (p = 0.006). Conclusions: Laser retinopexy is safely and effectively performed by residents, with no worse outcomes than procedures performed by specialists. A high rate of additional laser may be needed to achieve RD prophylaxis, and higher-risk cases can be identified at presentation and then referred to specialists.
AB - Objective: To compare the outcomes of laser retinopexy for the treatment of retinal tears between residents and specialists, and to identify tear characteristics associated with the risk of progression to retinal detachment (RD). Methods: A retrospective review of 307 eyes treated by laser retinopexy, categorized by the performing physician, either a resident (217 cases) or a specialist (90 cases). Recorded parameters included the number, size, and location of the retinal tears, the presence of bridging vessels, vitreous hemorrhage (VH), or subretinal fluid (SRF), the need for additional laser, progression to RD, and surgery. Results: Additional laser was performed in 42.3%of cases in the resident group and 35.5%in the specialist group (p = 0.26). Progression to RD occurred in 6.9%of cases in the resident group and 5.5%in the specialist group (p = 0.66). The presence of VH and SRF were associated with an increased risk of progression to RD (p < 0.0001 and 0.003, respectively). A higher proportion of cases with SRF were treated by specialists (p = 0.006). Conclusions: Laser retinopexy is safely and effectively performed by residents, with no worse outcomes than procedures performed by specialists. A high rate of additional laser may be needed to achieve RD prophylaxis, and higher-risk cases can be identified at presentation and then referred to specialists.
KW - Laser retinopexy
KW - Progression to retinal detachment
KW - Retinal tears
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85089768506&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1159/000507483
DO - 10.1159/000507483
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 32209786
AN - SCOPUS:85089768506
SN - 0030-3755
VL - 243
SP - 355
EP - 359
JO - Ophthalmologica
JF - Ophthalmologica
IS - 5
ER -