Optimal control of false discovery criteria in the two-group model

Ruth Heller*, Saharon Rosset

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

15 Scopus citations

Abstract

The highly influential two-group model in testing a large number of statistical hypotheses assumes that the test statistics are drawn independently from a mixture of a high probability null distribution and a low probability alternative. Optimal control of the marginal false discovery rate (mFDR), in the sense that it provides maximal power (expected true discoveries) subject to mFDR control, is known to be achieved by thresholding the local false discovery rate (locFDR), the probability of the hypothesis being null given the set of test statistics, with a fixed threshold. We address the challenge of controlling optimally the popular false discovery rate (FDR) or positive FDR (pFDR) in the general two-group model, which also allows for dependence between the test statistics. These criteria are less conservative than the mFDR criterion, so they make more rejections in expectation. We derive their optimal multiple testing (OMT) policies, which turn out to be thresholding the locFDR with a threshold that is a function of the entire set of statistics. We develop an efficient algorithm for finding these policies, and use it for problems with thousands of hypotheses. We illustrate these procedures on gene expression studies.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)133-155
Number of pages23
JournalJournal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B: Statistical Methodology
Volume83
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2021

Funding

FundersFunder number
Israeli Science Foundation1049/16, 1804/16, 2180/20
Israel Science Foundation

    Keywords

    • false discovery rate
    • infinite linear programming
    • large-scale inference
    • multiple testing
    • positive FDR

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Optimal control of false discovery criteria in the two-group model'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this