TY - CHAP
T1 - One-Sided Error Testing of Monomials and Affine Subspaces
AU - Goldreich, Oded
AU - Ron, Dana
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2025.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - We study the query complexity of testing monomials (resp., affine and linear subspaces) with one-sided error. Actually, we consider three versions of each of these properties, and obtain the following results regarding the query complexity of testing them with one-sided error. The general version, in which the arity of the monomial (resp., co-dimension of the subspace) is not specified, has query complexity O~(1/ϵ), where ϵ denotes the proximity parameter.The bounded version, in which the arity of the monomial (resp., co-dimension of the subspace) is upper bounded by a fixed parameter, has query complexity O~(1/ϵ).The exact version, in which the arity of the monomial (resp., co-dimension of the subspace) is required to equal a fixed parameter (e.g., equals 2), has query complexity Ω~(logn), where n denotes the length of the argument for the tested function. The general version, in which the arity of the monomial (resp., co-dimension of the subspace) is not specified, has query complexity O~(1/ϵ), where ϵ denotes the proximity parameter. The bounded version, in which the arity of the monomial (resp., co-dimension of the subspace) is upper bounded by a fixed parameter, has query complexity O~(1/ϵ). The exact version, in which the arity of the monomial (resp., co-dimension of the subspace) is required to equal a fixed parameter (e.g., equals 2), has query complexity Ω~(logn), where n denotes the length of the argument for the tested function. The running time of the testers in the positive results is linear in their query complexity.
AB - We study the query complexity of testing monomials (resp., affine and linear subspaces) with one-sided error. Actually, we consider three versions of each of these properties, and obtain the following results regarding the query complexity of testing them with one-sided error. The general version, in which the arity of the monomial (resp., co-dimension of the subspace) is not specified, has query complexity O~(1/ϵ), where ϵ denotes the proximity parameter.The bounded version, in which the arity of the monomial (resp., co-dimension of the subspace) is upper bounded by a fixed parameter, has query complexity O~(1/ϵ).The exact version, in which the arity of the monomial (resp., co-dimension of the subspace) is required to equal a fixed parameter (e.g., equals 2), has query complexity Ω~(logn), where n denotes the length of the argument for the tested function. The general version, in which the arity of the monomial (resp., co-dimension of the subspace) is not specified, has query complexity O~(1/ϵ), where ϵ denotes the proximity parameter. The bounded version, in which the arity of the monomial (resp., co-dimension of the subspace) is upper bounded by a fixed parameter, has query complexity O~(1/ϵ). The exact version, in which the arity of the monomial (resp., co-dimension of the subspace) is required to equal a fixed parameter (e.g., equals 2), has query complexity Ω~(logn), where n denotes the length of the argument for the tested function. The running time of the testers in the positive results is linear in their query complexity.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105009249907
U2 - 10.1007/978-3-031-88946-2_22
DO - 10.1007/978-3-031-88946-2_22
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontobookanthology.chapter???
AN - SCOPUS:105009249907
T3 - Lecture Notes in Computer Science
SP - 388
EP - 430
BT - Lecture Notes in Computer Science
PB - Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH
ER -