On the positive and negative effects of self-efficacy on performance: Reward as a moderator

Keren Stirin Tzur, Yoav Ganzach*, Asya Pazy

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

23 Scopus citations

Abstract

We address the controversy regarding the sign of the effect of self-efficacy on performance. We propose that when reward is high, self-efficacy has a positive effect on performance, whereas when reward is low, it has a negative effect. This hypothesis was tested in three experiments (with sample sizes of 76, 99, and 111) in which reward and self-efficacy were manipulated and performance was measured using different manipulations and tasks in both within-factor and between-factor designs. The results supported the hypothesis that reward moderates the effect of self-efficacy on performance. When reward was high, the effect of self-efficacy on performance was positive, whereas when reward was low, the effect of self-efficacy on performance was negative.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)362-377
Number of pages16
JournalHuman Performance
Volume29
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 19 Oct 2016

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'On the positive and negative effects of self-efficacy on performance: Reward as a moderator'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this