TY - JOUR
T1 - On The Memory Complexity of Uniformity Testing
AU - Berg, Tomer
AU - Ordentlich, Or
AU - Shayevitz, Ofer
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 T. Berg, O. Ordentlich & O. Shayevitz.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - In this paper we consider the problem of uniformity testing with limited memory. We observe a sequence of independent identically distributed random variables drawn from a distribution p over [n], which is either uniform or is ε-far from uniform under the total variation distance, and our goal is to determine the correct hypothesis. At each time point we are allowed to update the state of a finite-memory machine with S states, where each state of the machine is assigned one of the hypotheses, and we are interested in obtaining an asymptotic probability of error at most 0 < δ < 1/2 uniformly under both hypotheses. The main contribution of this paper is deriving upper and lower bounds on the number of states S needed in order to achieve a constant error probability δ, as a function of n and ε, where our upper bound is O(n logεn ) and our lower bound is Ω(n + 1ε ). Prior works in the field have almost exclusively used collision counting for upper bounds, and the Paninski mixture for lower bounds. Somewhat surprisingly, in the limited memory with unlimited samples setup, the optimal solution does not involve counting collisions, and the Paninski prior is not hard. Thus, different proof techniques are needed in order to attain our bounds.
AB - In this paper we consider the problem of uniformity testing with limited memory. We observe a sequence of independent identically distributed random variables drawn from a distribution p over [n], which is either uniform or is ε-far from uniform under the total variation distance, and our goal is to determine the correct hypothesis. At each time point we are allowed to update the state of a finite-memory machine with S states, where each state of the machine is assigned one of the hypotheses, and we are interested in obtaining an asymptotic probability of error at most 0 < δ < 1/2 uniformly under both hypotheses. The main contribution of this paper is deriving upper and lower bounds on the number of states S needed in order to achieve a constant error probability δ, as a function of n and ε, where our upper bound is O(n logεn ) and our lower bound is Ω(n + 1ε ). Prior works in the field have almost exclusively used collision counting for upper bounds, and the Paninski mixture for lower bounds. Somewhat surprisingly, in the limited memory with unlimited samples setup, the optimal solution does not involve counting collisions, and the Paninski prior is not hard. Thus, different proof techniques are needed in order to attain our bounds.
KW - Memory complexity
KW - uniformity testing
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85164034602&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.conferencearticle???
AN - SCOPUS:85164034602
SN - 2640-3498
VL - 178
SP - 3506
EP - 3523
JO - Proceedings of Machine Learning Research
JF - Proceedings of Machine Learning Research
T2 - 35th Conference on Learning Theory, COLT 2022
Y2 - 2 July 2022 through 5 July 2022
ER -