Abstract
Although governments of most developing countries express grave concern over current rates of rural-to-urban migration, their policies in this regard are often either ambivalent or accomodationist. An economic argument hypothesizes that increased immigration actually benefits urban profit-earners by exerting downward pressure on wages and leading to higher savings, investment, and output growth. Various consequences of rural-to-urban migration that might encourage profit-earners and governments to adopt an effective antimigratory stand are examined and rejected.-Author
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 95-102 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | Population and Development Review |
| Volume | 6 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| State | Published - 1980 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'On slowing metropolitan city growth ( developing countries).'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver