Abstract
Although governments of most developing countries express grave concern over current rates of rural-to-urban migration, their policies in this regard are often either ambivalent or accomodationist. An economic argument hypothesizes that increased immigration actually benefits urban profit-earners by exerting downward pressure on wages and leading to higher savings, investment, and output growth. Various consequences of rural-to-urban migration that might encourage profit-earners and governments to adopt an effective antimigratory stand are examined and rejected.-Author
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 95-102 |
Number of pages | 8 |
Journal | Population and Development Review |
Volume | 6 |
Issue number | 1 |
State | Published - 1980 |