TY - JOUR
T1 - On home turf
T2 - Interview location and its social meaning
AU - Herzog, Hanna
N1 - Funding Information:
4The part of the study on Israeli-Palestinian women in the peace movement was supported by Tami Steinmetz Center for Peace Research, Tel Aviv University; The Harry Truman Research Institute for the Advancement of Peace, Hebrew University, Jerusalem; Israel Foundation Trustees, and The Golda Meir Institute at Tel Aviv University. 5This part of the study was supported by Israeli Ministry of Science. 6On language and how it affects the interview process, see for example: Rubin and Rubin 1995, pp. 172–173. This topic is beyond the scope of the present paper, but is certainly worthy of discussion within the context of the multiple strata (academic, gender, national) of the interviewees’ life situation.
PY - 2005/3
Y1 - 2005/3
N2 - This paper argues that interview location plays a role in constructing reality, serving simultaneously as both cultural product and producer. Thus, the choice of interview location (who chooses and what place is chosen) is not just a technical matter of convenience and comfort. It should be examined within the social context of the study being conducted and analyzed as an integral part of the interpretation of the findings. In the present case study, involving Palestinian female citizens of Israel, the decision of where to hold the interview allowed the participants to negotiate directly or symbolically with societal norms and to express their re/positioning in Israeli society and in their own community and to demand that the interviewers, particularly the Jewish ones, traverse both geographic and social boundaries. The interview not only structured the individual subjectivity of interviewer and participant but also broadened and deepened the concept of knowledge and its sources, and incorporated the subjects' experiential truths as part of a gendered, ethnonational social reality.
AB - This paper argues that interview location plays a role in constructing reality, serving simultaneously as both cultural product and producer. Thus, the choice of interview location (who chooses and what place is chosen) is not just a technical matter of convenience and comfort. It should be examined within the social context of the study being conducted and analyzed as an integral part of the interpretation of the findings. In the present case study, involving Palestinian female citizens of Israel, the decision of where to hold the interview allowed the participants to negotiate directly or symbolically with societal norms and to express their re/positioning in Israeli society and in their own community and to demand that the interviewers, particularly the Jewish ones, traverse both geographic and social boundaries. The interview not only structured the individual subjectivity of interviewer and participant but also broadened and deepened the concept of knowledge and its sources, and incorporated the subjects' experiential truths as part of a gendered, ethnonational social reality.
KW - In-depth interview
KW - Interview society
KW - Location
KW - Palestinian women
KW - Social boundaries
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=16244408933&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11133-005-2629-8
DO - 10.1007/s11133-005-2629-8
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.systematicreview???
AN - SCOPUS:16244408933
SN - 0162-0436
VL - 28
SP - 25
EP - 47
JO - Qualitative Sociology
JF - Qualitative Sociology
IS - 1
ER -