Objectivity and subjectivity in the decision making process

John T. Buchanan*, Erez J. Henig, Mordecai I. Henig

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

57 Scopus citations

Abstract

Classical Operations Research assumed objectivity. Operations researchers hardly bothered to ask the decision maker about his or her preferences, assuming that a well-defined single objective function was an adequate representation of the decision problem. Many multicriteria decision methods began in response to this failure of Operations Research. Other methods took a totally different and more subjective point of view. In this paper, we discuss objective and subjective descriptions, their interpretation and use in decision making. In the center of the ability to distinguish between these objective and subjective components stand scientific methods and scientists. We argue that it is possible and necessary to understand where and how objective measures should be replaced by subjective measures and judgement in the decision making process.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)333-345
Number of pages13
JournalAnnals of Operations Research
Volume80
StatePublished - 1998

Keywords

  • Decision making process
  • Multiple criteria
  • Philosophy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Objectivity and subjectivity in the decision making process'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this