Nurse/physician conflict management mode choices: Implications for improved collaborative practice

Tova Hendel*, Miri Fish, Ornit Berger

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

45 Scopus citations

Abstract

In today's complex healthcare organizations, conflicts between physicians and nurses occur daily. Consequently, organizational conflict has grown into a major subfield of organizational behavior. Researchers have claimed that conflict has a beneficial effect on work group function and identified collaboration as one of the intervening variables that may explain the relationship between magnet hospitals and positive patient outcomes. The purpose of this study was to identify and compare conflict mode choices of physicians and head nurses in acute care hospitals and examine the relationship of conflict mode choices with their background characteristics. In a cross-sectional correlational study, 75 physicians and 54 head nurses in 5 hospitals were surveyed, using the Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Mode Instrument. No difference was found between physicians and nurses in choice of the most frequently used mode in conflict management. The compromising mode was found to be the significantly most commonly chosen mode (P = .00) by both. Collaborating was chosen significantly more frequently among head nurses (P = .001) and least frequently among physicians (P = .00). Most of the respondents' characteristics were not found to be correlated with mode choices. The findings indicate a need to enhance partnerships in the clinical environment to ensure quality patient care and staff satisfaction.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)244-253
Number of pages10
JournalNursing Administration Quarterly
Volume31
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2007

Keywords

  • Collaboration
  • Conflict management
  • Conflict mode
  • Head nurses
  • Physicians

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Nurse/physician conflict management mode choices: Implications for improved collaborative practice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this