TY - JOUR
T1 - Not a melting pot
T2 - Plant species aggregate in their non-native range
AU - Stotz, Gisela C.
AU - Cahill, James F.
AU - Bennett, Jonathan A.
AU - Carlyle, Cameron N.
AU - Bork, Edward W.
AU - Askarizadeh, Diana
AU - Bartha, Sandor
AU - Beierkuhnlein, Carl
AU - Boldgiv, Bazartseren
AU - Brown, Leslie
AU - Cabido, Marcelo
AU - Campetella, Giandiego
AU - Chelli, Stefano
AU - Cohen, Ofer
AU - Díaz, Sandra
AU - Enrico, Lucas
AU - Ensing, David
AU - Erdenetsetseg, Batdelger
AU - Fidelis, Alessandra
AU - Garris, Heath W.
AU - Henry, Hugh A.L.
AU - Jentsch, Anke
AU - Jouri, Mohammad Hassan
AU - Koorem, Kadri
AU - Manning, Peter
AU - Mitchell, Randall
AU - Moora, Mari
AU - Overbeck, Gerhard E.
AU - Pither, Jason
AU - Reinhart, Kurt O.
AU - Sternberg, Marcelo
AU - Tungalag, Radnaakhand
AU - Undrakhbold, Sainbileg
AU - van Rooyen, Margaretha
AU - Wellstein, Camilla
AU - Zobel, Martin
AU - Fraser, Lauchlan H.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd
PY - 2020/3/1
Y1 - 2020/3/1
N2 - Aim: Plant species continue to be moved outside of their native range by human activities. Here, we aim to determine whether, once introduced, plants assimilate into native communities or whether they aggregate, thus forming mosaics of native- and alien-rich communities. Alien species might aggregate in their non-native range owing to shared habitat preferences, such as their tendency to establish in high-biomass, species-poor areas. Location: Twenty-two herbaceous grasslands in 14 countries, mainly in the temperate zone. Time period: 2012–2016. Major taxa studied: Plants. Methods: We used a globally coordinated survey. Within this survey, we found 46 plant species, predominantly from Eurasia, for which we had co-occurrence data in their native and non-native ranges. We tested for differences in co-occurrence patterns of 46 species between their native (home) and non-native (away) range. We also tested whether species had similar habitat preferences, by testing for differences in total biomass and species richness of the patches that species occupy in their native and non-native ranges. Results: We found the same species to show different patterns of association depending on whether they were in their native or non-native range. Alien species were negatively associated with native species; instead, they aggregated with other alien species in species-poor, high-biomass communities in their non-native range compared with their native range. Main conclusions: The strong differences between the native (home) and non-native (away) range in species co-occurrence patterns are evidence that the way in which species associate with resident communities in their non-native range is not species dependent, but is instead a property of being away from their native range. These results thus highlight that species might undergo important ecological changes when introduced away from their native range. Overall, we show origin-dependent associations that result in novel communities, in which alien-rich patches exist within a mosaic of native-dominated communities.
AB - Aim: Plant species continue to be moved outside of their native range by human activities. Here, we aim to determine whether, once introduced, plants assimilate into native communities or whether they aggregate, thus forming mosaics of native- and alien-rich communities. Alien species might aggregate in their non-native range owing to shared habitat preferences, such as their tendency to establish in high-biomass, species-poor areas. Location: Twenty-two herbaceous grasslands in 14 countries, mainly in the temperate zone. Time period: 2012–2016. Major taxa studied: Plants. Methods: We used a globally coordinated survey. Within this survey, we found 46 plant species, predominantly from Eurasia, for which we had co-occurrence data in their native and non-native ranges. We tested for differences in co-occurrence patterns of 46 species between their native (home) and non-native (away) range. We also tested whether species had similar habitat preferences, by testing for differences in total biomass and species richness of the patches that species occupy in their native and non-native ranges. Results: We found the same species to show different patterns of association depending on whether they were in their native or non-native range. Alien species were negatively associated with native species; instead, they aggregated with other alien species in species-poor, high-biomass communities in their non-native range compared with their native range. Main conclusions: The strong differences between the native (home) and non-native (away) range in species co-occurrence patterns are evidence that the way in which species associate with resident communities in their non-native range is not species dependent, but is instead a property of being away from their native range. These results thus highlight that species might undergo important ecological changes when introduced away from their native range. Overall, we show origin-dependent associations that result in novel communities, in which alien-rich patches exist within a mosaic of native-dominated communities.
KW - alien species
KW - biodiversity threats
KW - biological invasions
KW - grassland ecology
KW - native range
KW - novel ecosystems
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85076756355&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/geb.13046
DO - 10.1111/geb.13046
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:85076756355
SN - 1466-822X
VL - 29
SP - 482
EP - 490
JO - Global Ecology and Biogeography
JF - Global Ecology and Biogeography
IS - 3
ER -