TY - JOUR
T1 - Non-equipartition of energy, masses of nova ejecta, and type ia supernovae
AU - Shara, Michael M.
AU - Yaron, Ofer
AU - Prialnik, Dina
AU - Kovetz, Attay
PY - 2010
Y1 - 2010
N2 - The total masses ejected during classical nova (CN) eruptions are needed to answer two questions with broad astrophysical implications: can accreting white dwarfs be "pushed over" the Chandrasekhar mass limit to yield type Ia supernovae? Are ultra-luminous red variables a new kind of astrophysical phenomenon, or merely extreme classical novae? We review the methods used to determine nova ejecta masses. Except for the unique case of BT Mon (nova 1939), all nova ejecta mass determinations depend on untested assumptions and multi-parameter modeling. The remarkably simple assumption of equipartition between kinetic and radiated energy (E kin and E rad, respectively) in nova ejecta has been invoked as a way around this conundrum for the ultra-luminous red variable in M31. The deduced mass is far larger than that produced by any CN model. Our nova eruption simulations show that radiation and kinetic energy in nova ejecta are very far from being in energy equipartition, with variations of 4 orders of magnitude in the ratio E kin/E rad being commonplace. The assumption of equipartition must not be used to deduce nova ejecta masses; any such "determinations" can be overestimates by a factor of up to 10,000. We data-mined our extensive series of nova simulations to search for correlations that could yield nova ejecta masses. Remarkably, the mass ejected during a nova eruption is dependent only on (and is directly proportional to) E rad. If we measure the distance to an erupting nova and its bolometric light curve, then E rad and hence the mass ejected can be directly measured.
AB - The total masses ejected during classical nova (CN) eruptions are needed to answer two questions with broad astrophysical implications: can accreting white dwarfs be "pushed over" the Chandrasekhar mass limit to yield type Ia supernovae? Are ultra-luminous red variables a new kind of astrophysical phenomenon, or merely extreme classical novae? We review the methods used to determine nova ejecta masses. Except for the unique case of BT Mon (nova 1939), all nova ejecta mass determinations depend on untested assumptions and multi-parameter modeling. The remarkably simple assumption of equipartition between kinetic and radiated energy (E kin and E rad, respectively) in nova ejecta has been invoked as a way around this conundrum for the ultra-luminous red variable in M31. The deduced mass is far larger than that produced by any CN model. Our nova eruption simulations show that radiation and kinetic energy in nova ejecta are very far from being in energy equipartition, with variations of 4 orders of magnitude in the ratio E kin/E rad being commonplace. The assumption of equipartition must not be used to deduce nova ejecta masses; any such "determinations" can be overestimates by a factor of up to 10,000. We data-mined our extensive series of nova simulations to search for correlations that could yield nova ejecta masses. Remarkably, the mass ejected during a nova eruption is dependent only on (and is directly proportional to) E rad. If we measure the distance to an erupting nova and its bolometric light curve, then E rad and hence the mass ejected can be directly measured.
KW - Accretion, accretion disks
KW - Binaries: close
KW - Novae, cataclysmic variables
KW - White dwarfs
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77950292802&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1088/2041-8205/712/2/L143
DO - 10.1088/2041-8205/712/2/L143
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:77950292802
SN - 2041-8205
VL - 712
SP - L143-L147
JO - Astrophysical Journal Letters
JF - Astrophysical Journal Letters
IS - 2 PART 2
ER -