Abstract
Two questions are prominent in modern minimalist discussions: how abstract are the principles which govern grammar, and how far do syntax and the lexicon penetrate one another? We argue that very sharp data reveal the presence of a passive operation for ability nominalizations which (a) entails covert phrasal movement, (b) a 'long-distance’ connection to an Edge, (c) LF sensitivity, and (d) the Chain Condition (following Chomsky (2001), Pesetsky (2000), as well as Frampton & Gutman (2000), Fu et al.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Quantification, Definiteness, and Nominalization |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press |
| Pages | 365-385 |
| Number of pages | 21 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9781383044843 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9780199541089 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1 Jan 2009 |
Keywords
- attention
- distribution
- literature
- operations
- received
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Nominal voices'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver