TY - JOUR
T1 - Newborn Hearing Screening
T2 - Early Ear Examination Improves the Pass Rate
AU - Schwarz, Yehuda
AU - Mauthner, Roye
AU - Kraus, Oded
AU - Gluk, Ofer
AU - Globus, Omer
AU - Kariv, Liron
AU - Tamir, Sharon Ovnat
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023, AVES. All rights reserved.
PY - 2023/9
Y1 - 2023/9
N2 - BACKGROUND: Temporary conductive hearing loss due to vernix accumulation in the external ear canal may lead to a false-positive result in newborn hearing screening tests. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether ear examination and intervention may reduce the false-positive rate prior to hospital discharge. METHODS: A case series of 42 newborns who failed initial otoacoustic emissions screening were studied in our institution between May and December 2020. RESULTS: During the study period, a total of 735 neonates (1470 ears) were screened by otoacoustic emissions in our hospital. Forty-two newborns who failed otoacoustic emissions were included in our study. They constituted 3.9% (n = 58 ears) of the total number of ears screened. Forty-four ears (75.9%) passed and 14 ears (24.1%) failed otoacoustic emissions rescreening performed shortly following vernix cleaning. Twelve of the remaining 14 ears passed at 10-day rescreening. The remaining 2 ears presented true bilateral hearing loss. During the study period, the general false-positive rate decreased from 56/735 (7.61%) to 12/735(1.63%) (P <.00001). CONCLUSION: Cleaning the vernix of infants who failed otoacoustic emissions prior to hospital discharge lowers the false-positive rate of universal neonatal hearing screening. We may assume that vernix cleaning will reduce significant healthcare workload, costs of unnecessary investigations, as well as parental anxiety.
AB - BACKGROUND: Temporary conductive hearing loss due to vernix accumulation in the external ear canal may lead to a false-positive result in newborn hearing screening tests. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether ear examination and intervention may reduce the false-positive rate prior to hospital discharge. METHODS: A case series of 42 newborns who failed initial otoacoustic emissions screening were studied in our institution between May and December 2020. RESULTS: During the study period, a total of 735 neonates (1470 ears) were screened by otoacoustic emissions in our hospital. Forty-two newborns who failed otoacoustic emissions were included in our study. They constituted 3.9% (n = 58 ears) of the total number of ears screened. Forty-four ears (75.9%) passed and 14 ears (24.1%) failed otoacoustic emissions rescreening performed shortly following vernix cleaning. Twelve of the remaining 14 ears passed at 10-day rescreening. The remaining 2 ears presented true bilateral hearing loss. During the study period, the general false-positive rate decreased from 56/735 (7.61%) to 12/735(1.63%) (P <.00001). CONCLUSION: Cleaning the vernix of infants who failed otoacoustic emissions prior to hospital discharge lowers the false-positive rate of universal neonatal hearing screening. We may assume that vernix cleaning will reduce significant healthcare workload, costs of unnecessary investigations, as well as parental anxiety.
KW - Hearing loss
KW - newborn hearing screening
KW - otoacoustic emission
KW - referral rate
KW - vernix
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85173013984&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.5152/iao.2023.22987
DO - 10.5152/iao.2023.22987
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 37789627
AN - SCOPUS:85173013984
SN - 1308-7649
VL - 19
SP - 402
EP - 406
JO - Journal of International Advanced Otology
JF - Journal of International Advanced Otology
IS - 5
ER -