TY - JOUR
T1 - New upper bounds for parent-identifying codes and traceability codes
AU - Shangguan, Chong
AU - Ma, Jingxue
AU - Ge, Gennian
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.
PY - 2018/8/1
Y1 - 2018/8/1
N2 - In the last two decades, parent-identifying codes and traceability codes are introduced to prevent copyrighted digital data from unauthorized use. They have important applications in the scenarios like digital fingerprinting and broadcast encryption schemes. A major open problem in this research area is to determine the upper bounds for the cardinalities of these codes. In this paper we will focus on this theme. Consider a code of length N which is defined over an alphabet of size q. Let MIPPC(N, q, t) and MTA(N, q, t) denote the maximal cardinalities of t-parent-identifying codes and t-traceability codes, respectively, where t is known as the strength of the codes. We show MIPPC(N, q, t) ≤ rq⌈N/(v-1)⌉+ (v- 1 - r) q⌊N/(v-1)⌋, where v= ⌊ (t/ 2 + 1) 2⌋ , 0 ≤ r≤ v- 2 and N≡rmod(v-1). This new bound improves two previously known bounds of Blackburn, and Alon and Stav. On the other hand, MTA(N, q, t) is still not known for almost all t. In 2010, Blackburn, Etzion and Ng asked whether MTA(N,q,t)≤cq⌈N/t2⌉ or not, where c is a constant depending only on N, and they have shown the only known validity of this bound for t= 2. By using some complicated combinatorial counting arguments, we prove this bound for t= 3. This is the first non-trivial upper bound in the literature for traceability codes with strength three.
AB - In the last two decades, parent-identifying codes and traceability codes are introduced to prevent copyrighted digital data from unauthorized use. They have important applications in the scenarios like digital fingerprinting and broadcast encryption schemes. A major open problem in this research area is to determine the upper bounds for the cardinalities of these codes. In this paper we will focus on this theme. Consider a code of length N which is defined over an alphabet of size q. Let MIPPC(N, q, t) and MTA(N, q, t) denote the maximal cardinalities of t-parent-identifying codes and t-traceability codes, respectively, where t is known as the strength of the codes. We show MIPPC(N, q, t) ≤ rq⌈N/(v-1)⌉+ (v- 1 - r) q⌊N/(v-1)⌋, where v= ⌊ (t/ 2 + 1) 2⌋ , 0 ≤ r≤ v- 2 and N≡rmod(v-1). This new bound improves two previously known bounds of Blackburn, and Alon and Stav. On the other hand, MTA(N, q, t) is still not known for almost all t. In 2010, Blackburn, Etzion and Ng asked whether MTA(N,q,t)≤cq⌈N/t2⌉ or not, where c is a constant depending only on N, and they have shown the only known validity of this bound for t= 2. By using some complicated combinatorial counting arguments, we prove this bound for t= 3. This is the first non-trivial upper bound in the literature for traceability codes with strength three.
KW - Parent-identifying codes
KW - Traceability codes
KW - Traitor tracing schemes
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85031915073&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10623-017-0420-y
DO - 10.1007/s10623-017-0420-y
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:85031915073
SN - 0925-1022
VL - 86
SP - 1727
EP - 1737
JO - Designs, Codes, and Cryptography
JF - Designs, Codes, and Cryptography
IS - 8
ER -