TY - JOUR
T1 - My fair future self
T2 - The role of temporal distance and self-enhancement in prediction
AU - Stephan, Elena
AU - Sedikides, Constantine
AU - Heller, Daniel
AU - Shidlovski, Daniella
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Guilford Publications, Inc.
PY - 2015
Y1 - 2015
N2 - Information people rely on when making self-predictions may be influenced by temporal distance and the self-enhancement motive. We proposed, drawing from Construal Level Theory, that temporally distant (vs. near) predictions reflect the "gist" self-attributes, rather than other attributes ("noise"). Based on the self-enhancement literature, positive (vs. negative) attributes will be perceived as the "gist." In three studies, we tested the hypothesis that positive attributes are more prominent in distant predictions. Distant (compared to near) predictions reflect the "gist" attributes, are more positive and confident (Study 1). Such predictions rely on positive (rather than negative) attributes (Study 2). Distant predictions reflect a greater better-than-average effect, better ratings on positive (and not-as-bad on negative) attributes in comparison to peers (Study 3). These tendencies hold true for individuals with varying levels of self-esteem (Studies 1, 3). The studies suggest that temporal distance and motivation to enhance the favorability of self-concept both influence prediction.
AB - Information people rely on when making self-predictions may be influenced by temporal distance and the self-enhancement motive. We proposed, drawing from Construal Level Theory, that temporally distant (vs. near) predictions reflect the "gist" self-attributes, rather than other attributes ("noise"). Based on the self-enhancement literature, positive (vs. negative) attributes will be perceived as the "gist." In three studies, we tested the hypothesis that positive attributes are more prominent in distant predictions. Distant (compared to near) predictions reflect the "gist" attributes, are more positive and confident (Study 1). Such predictions rely on positive (rather than negative) attributes (Study 2). Distant predictions reflect a greater better-than-average effect, better ratings on positive (and not-as-bad on negative) attributes in comparison to peers (Study 3). These tendencies hold true for individuals with varying levels of self-esteem (Studies 1, 3). The studies suggest that temporal distance and motivation to enhance the favorability of self-concept both influence prediction.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84928668958&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1521/soco.2015.33.2.149
DO - 10.1521/soco.2015.33.2.149
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:84928668958
SN - 0278-016X
VL - 33
SP - 149
EP - 168
JO - Social Cognition
JF - Social Cognition
IS - 2
ER -