TY - JOUR
T1 - Multiple-snapshots BSS with general covariance structures
T2 - A partial maximum likelihood approach involving weighted joint diagonalization
AU - Yeredor, Arie
PY - 2012/8
Y1 - 2012/8
N2 - Maximum Likelihood (ML) blind separation of Gaussian sources with different temporal covariance structures generally requires the estimation of the underlying temporal covariance matrices. The possible availability of multiple realizations (snapshots) of the mixtures (all synchronized to some external stimulus) may enable such estimation. In general, however, since these temporal covariance matrices are high-dimensional, reliable estimation thereof might require a prohibitively large number of snapshots. In this work, we propose to take an alternative, partial and approximate ML approach, which regards a selected set of spatial sample-generalized-correlations of the observations (rather than the observations themselves) as the front-end data for the ML estimate. As we show, the implied Correlations-Based approximate ML (CBML) estimate, which can also be regarded as a weighted joint diagonalization approach, requires the estimation of considerably smaller covariance matrices, and can therefore be preferable to the full Data-Based ML (DBML) estimate. Therefore, although asymptotically sub-optimal, under sub-asymptotic conditions CBML can outperform the asymptotically optimal DBML, as we demonstrate in simulation.
AB - Maximum Likelihood (ML) blind separation of Gaussian sources with different temporal covariance structures generally requires the estimation of the underlying temporal covariance matrices. The possible availability of multiple realizations (snapshots) of the mixtures (all synchronized to some external stimulus) may enable such estimation. In general, however, since these temporal covariance matrices are high-dimensional, reliable estimation thereof might require a prohibitively large number of snapshots. In this work, we propose to take an alternative, partial and approximate ML approach, which regards a selected set of spatial sample-generalized-correlations of the observations (rather than the observations themselves) as the front-end data for the ML estimate. As we show, the implied Correlations-Based approximate ML (CBML) estimate, which can also be regarded as a weighted joint diagonalization approach, requires the estimation of considerably smaller covariance matrices, and can therefore be preferable to the full Data-Based ML (DBML) estimate. Therefore, although asymptotically sub-optimal, under sub-asymptotic conditions CBML can outperform the asymptotically optimal DBML, as we demonstrate in simulation.
KW - BSS
KW - ICA
KW - Maximum Likelihood separation
KW - Weighting
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84858078779&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.sigpro.2011.09.036
DO - 10.1016/j.sigpro.2011.09.036
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:84858078779
VL - 92
SP - 1832
EP - 1843
JO - Signal Processing
JF - Signal Processing
SN - 0165-1684
IS - 8
ER -