Much Dilution Little Load in Lavie and Torralbo's (2010) Response: A Reply

Yehoshua Tsal*, Hanna Benoni

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

11 Scopus citations

Abstract

Lavie and Torralbo (2010) present a response to the critique of load theory put forward by Tsal and Benoni (2010). We note that this response includes long discussions that dilute the major points of the debate and deals only with the first experiment in Tsal and Benoni, and we question whether it covers the broader critique we offer. In our reply, we argue against the points made by Lavie and Torralbo and propose that the " dilution" critique of the theory is justified.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1665-1668
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
Volume36
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2010

Keywords

  • Dilution
  • Perceptual load
  • Selective attention
  • Visual attention
  • Visual perception

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Much Dilution Little Load in Lavie and Torralbo's (2010) Response: A Reply'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this