Moving beyond scientism and skepticism

Dan J. Stein*, Andrea C. Palk

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

Abstract

This chapter aims to address key conceptual debates in philosophy of psychiatry, putting forward an integrative position that is a useful resource for global mental health, neuroethics, and a dialog between these fields. The chapter outlines a number of perennial controversies about the diagnosis, pathogenesis, and treatment of mental disorders, and delineates "classical" and "critical" approaches to each. An integrative position that draws on the strength of each of these approaches, while avoiding the scientism of the classical approach and the skepticism of the critical approach is then put forward. This integrative position is consistent with key features of global mental health and neuroethics, and may also be useful in providing further support for them.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationGlobal Mental Health and Neuroethics
PublisherElsevier
Pages7-16
Number of pages10
ISBN (Electronic)9780128150634
ISBN (Print)9780128150641
DOIs
StatePublished - 16 Jan 2020
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Global mental health
  • Neuroethics
  • Pathogenesis of psychiatric disorders
  • Psychiatric diagnosis
  • Psychiatric nosology
  • Psychiatry
  • Scientism
  • Skepticism

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Moving beyond scientism and skepticism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this