Motivational stimuli to donate sperm among non-donor students

Maya Ronen*, Alon Kedem, Sarit Avraham, Michal Youngster, Gil Yerushalmi, Ariel Hourvitz, Itai Gat

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Sperm banks face a continuously evolving gap between the increasing demand for sperm donation (SD) vs. limited available reserve. To improve donors’ recruitment and increase supply, motivations towards SD should be investigated specifically among young men who have the potential to become donors. Our aim was to evaluate factors which increase and decrease predisposition to donate sperm among non-donor students, who represent a “potential pool” for possible donors’ recruitment. Results: Ninety-three men fulfilled the questionnaire with mean age of 28.2 ± 4.5 years. The most powerful incentive to donate sperm was financial reward followed by a willingness to help others to build a family (3.8 and 3.4, respectively). The most dominant consideration to decline donation was the fear of anonymity loss and future regret (4 and 3.8). While participants’ willingness for anonymous SD was fair (2.8), the open-identity donation was rated significantly lower (1.75, p < 0.01). Familiarity with recipients and offspring had lower scores (1.9–2.2) as well. Conclusions: Young single men represent a suitable cohort for anonymous donation. Financial reward and willingness to help others are important positive incentives while anonymity preservation is crucial to maintain their willingness towards SD. Regulatory shifting towards open-identity SD necessitates the establishment of an alternative “potential pool” population as a reliable source to recruit donors.

Original languageEnglish
Article number29
JournalBasic and Clinical Andrology
Volume33
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2023

Keywords

  • Anonymity
  • Identity disclosure
  • Sperm bank
  • Sperm donation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Motivational stimuli to donate sperm among non-donor students'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this