TY - JOUR
T1 - Motivation for creativity in architectural design and engineering design students
T2 - Implications for design education
AU - Casakin, Hernan
AU - Kreitler, Shulamith
PY - 2010/11
Y1 - 2010/11
N2 - The investigation reported here dealt with the study of motivation for creativity. The goals were to assess motivation for creativity in architectural design and engineering design students based on the Cognitive Orientation theory which defines motivation as a function of a set of belief types, themes, and groupings identified as relevant for the development of creativity. Differences between the two groups of students were expected in some of the scores of the belief types, themes, and groupings. Participants were 112 students (52 from architecture, and 60 from engineering) who were administered the questionnaire of the Cognitive Orientation of Creativity. Significant differences in numerous motivational contents were observed between the groups of students. Major characteristics of the architectural design students were an emphasis on the inner world, inner-directedness, and a development of the self, and of the engineering design students being receptive to the environment, and demanding from oneself despite potential difficulties. The findings provide insights for intervention programs targeted at improving architectural and engineering design education.
AB - The investigation reported here dealt with the study of motivation for creativity. The goals were to assess motivation for creativity in architectural design and engineering design students based on the Cognitive Orientation theory which defines motivation as a function of a set of belief types, themes, and groupings identified as relevant for the development of creativity. Differences between the two groups of students were expected in some of the scores of the belief types, themes, and groupings. Participants were 112 students (52 from architecture, and 60 from engineering) who were administered the questionnaire of the Cognitive Orientation of Creativity. Significant differences in numerous motivational contents were observed between the groups of students. Major characteristics of the architectural design students were an emphasis on the inner world, inner-directedness, and a development of the self, and of the engineering design students being receptive to the environment, and demanding from oneself despite potential difficulties. The findings provide insights for intervention programs targeted at improving architectural and engineering design education.
KW - Architecture
KW - Cognitive orientation
KW - Creativity
KW - Design education
KW - Engineering
KW - Motivation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78049529787&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10798-009-9103-y
DO - 10.1007/s10798-009-9103-y
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:78049529787
SN - 0957-7572
VL - 20
SP - 477
EP - 493
JO - International Journal of Technology and Design Education
JF - International Journal of Technology and Design Education
IS - 4
ER -