TY - JOUR
T1 - Mortality prediction following transcatheter aortic valve replacement
T2 - A quantitative comparison of risk scores derived from populations treated with either surgical or percutaneous aortic valve replacement. the Israeli TAVR Registry Risk Model Accuracy Assessment (IRRMA) study
AU - Halkin, Amir
AU - Steinvil, Arie
AU - Witberg, Guy
AU - Barsheshet, Alon
AU - Barkagan, Michael
AU - Assali, Abid
AU - Segev, Amit
AU - Fefer, Paul
AU - Guetta, Victor
AU - Barbash, Israel M.
AU - Kornowski, Ran
AU - Finkelstein, Ariel
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
PY - 2016/7/15
Y1 - 2016/7/15
N2 - Background Accurate risk stratification is pivotal for appropriate selection of patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis for either surgical or transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). We sought to determine whether recent risk prediction models developed specifically in TAVR patients enhance prognostication in comparison with previous surgical scores used in clinical practice (EuroScore I, EuroScore II, STS). Methods The Israeli TAVR Registry Risk Model Accuracy Assessment (IRRMA) study utilized a multicenter prospective TAVR database (n = 1327) to perform a quantitative comparison between previous risk scores developed in either surgical or TAVR populations, with the present registry serving as an independent external validation set. Results In the IRRMA population, 4 variables (NYHA functional class IV, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, systolic pulmonary artery pressure ≥ 60 mm Hg, vascular access other than by the femoral route) identified by cross-validation and leave-one-out analyses provided the most discriminative model (C-statistic = 0.63) for predicting 30-day mortality. Previous scores developed in surgical (EuroScores I and II, STS), TAVR (France-2, OBSERVANT), or mixed (German AV score) populations were applied to the IRRMA cohort. Resultant C-statistics ranged between 0.52-0.71 (for the German AV and France-2 scores, respectively) and did not differ significantly (p = 0.07 for the comparison between the lowest and highest C-statistics). The observed C-statistic for 5 of these 6 scores was lower than originally reported when applied to the IRRMA population. Conclusion Available TAVR risk scores showed limited accuracy when applied to an independent validation set and did not enhance prognostication in comparison to previous surgical scores.
AB - Background Accurate risk stratification is pivotal for appropriate selection of patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis for either surgical or transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). We sought to determine whether recent risk prediction models developed specifically in TAVR patients enhance prognostication in comparison with previous surgical scores used in clinical practice (EuroScore I, EuroScore II, STS). Methods The Israeli TAVR Registry Risk Model Accuracy Assessment (IRRMA) study utilized a multicenter prospective TAVR database (n = 1327) to perform a quantitative comparison between previous risk scores developed in either surgical or TAVR populations, with the present registry serving as an independent external validation set. Results In the IRRMA population, 4 variables (NYHA functional class IV, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, systolic pulmonary artery pressure ≥ 60 mm Hg, vascular access other than by the femoral route) identified by cross-validation and leave-one-out analyses provided the most discriminative model (C-statistic = 0.63) for predicting 30-day mortality. Previous scores developed in surgical (EuroScores I and II, STS), TAVR (France-2, OBSERVANT), or mixed (German AV score) populations were applied to the IRRMA cohort. Resultant C-statistics ranged between 0.52-0.71 (for the German AV and France-2 scores, respectively) and did not differ significantly (p = 0.07 for the comparison between the lowest and highest C-statistics). The observed C-statistic for 5 of these 6 scores was lower than originally reported when applied to the IRRMA population. Conclusion Available TAVR risk scores showed limited accuracy when applied to an independent validation set and did not enhance prognostication in comparison to previous surgical scores.
KW - Aortic stenosis
KW - Prognosis
KW - Risk score
KW - Transcatheter aortic valve replacement
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84964354724&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.04.038
DO - 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.04.038
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 27128536
AN - SCOPUS:84964354724
SN - 0167-5273
VL - 215
SP - 227
EP - 231
JO - International Journal of Cardiology
JF - International Journal of Cardiology
ER -