Abstract
The current study focuses on a moral dilemma in military situations: the amount of force to be used in order to neutralize a "most wanted" terrorist. This study examines the association between this moral dilemma with 4 independent variables: agreement with the proportionality principle (mediating variable), level of religiosity, authoritarian personality, and political attitudes. Three equal groups of participants (together, N = 357) were included: Israeli regular army combat soldiers, Israeli reserve combat soldiers, and Israeli students. In accordance with the study hypotheses, the 4 independent variables significantly correlated with each other and with moral decisions. Structural equation modeling indicated that agreement with the proportionality principle is the best predictor of moral decision, and mediated the association between level of religiosity and political attitudes and moral decisions.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 169-184 |
Number of pages | 16 |
Journal | Military Psychology |
Volume | 27 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 1 May 2015 |
Keywords
- Authoritarian personality
- Level of religiosity
- Moral dilemma
- Political attitudes
- Proportionality principle