TY - JOUR
T1 - Monitoring stimulated cycles during in vitro fertilization treatment with ultrasound only preliminary results
AU - Wiser, Amir
AU - Gonen, Ofer
AU - Ghetler, Yehudit
AU - Shavit, Tal
AU - Berkovitz, Arie
AU - Shulman, Adrian
PY - 2012/6
Y1 - 2012/6
N2 - Objective: To evaluate if monitoring patients by ultrasound (US) only during in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment is safe. Design: Randomized prospective study. Intervention: Patients undergoing their first IVF treatment were randomized into two groups. The ultrasound only group (study group) was monitored by US for follicle size and endometrial thickness without blood tests. In this group, only one blood test was taken before human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) injection, to ensure a safe level of estradiol (E2) regarding ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) risk. The control group was monitored by ultrasound plus serum estradiol and progesterone concentration at each visit. Main outcome measure: Clinical pregnancy rate. Results: No differences were found between the groups in the parameters of IVF treatment, induction days, number of ampoules, E2 level of hCG, as well as embryo quality. The clinical pregnancy rate was not statistically different between the groups, 57.5% vs. 40.0%, respectively (p0.25). No OHSS cases were found among the study or control groups. Conclusion: Ultrasound as a single monitoring tool for IVF cycles is reliable, safe, patient friendly, and reduces treatment expenses. In an era of cost effectiveness awareness, this regimen should be considered for routine management in IVF programs.
AB - Objective: To evaluate if monitoring patients by ultrasound (US) only during in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment is safe. Design: Randomized prospective study. Intervention: Patients undergoing their first IVF treatment were randomized into two groups. The ultrasound only group (study group) was monitored by US for follicle size and endometrial thickness without blood tests. In this group, only one blood test was taken before human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) injection, to ensure a safe level of estradiol (E2) regarding ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) risk. The control group was monitored by ultrasound plus serum estradiol and progesterone concentration at each visit. Main outcome measure: Clinical pregnancy rate. Results: No differences were found between the groups in the parameters of IVF treatment, induction days, number of ampoules, E2 level of hCG, as well as embryo quality. The clinical pregnancy rate was not statistically different between the groups, 57.5% vs. 40.0%, respectively (p0.25). No OHSS cases were found among the study or control groups. Conclusion: Ultrasound as a single monitoring tool for IVF cycles is reliable, safe, patient friendly, and reduces treatment expenses. In an era of cost effectiveness awareness, this regimen should be considered for routine management in IVF programs.
KW - IVF
KW - Ovulation induction
KW - Pregnancy rate
KW - Ultrasound monitoring
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84861067148&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3109/09513590.2011.633666
DO - 10.3109/09513590.2011.633666
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 22456062
AN - SCOPUS:84861067148
SN - 0951-3590
VL - 28
SP - 429
EP - 431
JO - Gynecological Endocrinology
JF - Gynecological Endocrinology
IS - 6
ER -