TY - JOUR
T1 - Modified natural cycle using GnRH antagonist can be an optional treatment in poor responders undergoing IVF
AU - Elizur, Shai E.
AU - Aslan, Dilek
AU - Shulman, Adrian
AU - Weisz, Boaz
AU - Bider, David
AU - Dor, Jehoshua
PY - 2005/2
Y1 - 2005/2
N2 - Purpose: To investigate the efficacy of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist supplementation during natural cycles in poor responders undergoing IVF-ET treatment. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 540 cycles of 433 suitable patients who were divided by treatment protocol into modified natural, antagonist, and long agonist groups. There were 52 modified natural cycles with GnRH antagonist supplementation, 200 stimulated cycles with GnRH antagonist, and 288 long GnRH agonist cycles. Cycle characteristics and treatment outcomes were compared between the groups. Results: The mean number of oocytes retrieved in the modified natural group was significantly lower than in the stimulated antagonist and long agonist groups (1.4 ± 0.5 vs. 2.3 ± 1.1 and 2.5 ± 1.1, respectively, p < 0.05). The respective implantation and pregnancy rates were 10% and 14.3%, 6.75% and 10.2%, and 7.4% and 10.6%. Cycle outcome and cycle properties were similar. Conclusions: Modified natural IVF cycle with GnRH antagonist supplementation is a feasible alternative to ovarian stimulation protocols in poor responders.
AB - Purpose: To investigate the efficacy of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist supplementation during natural cycles in poor responders undergoing IVF-ET treatment. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 540 cycles of 433 suitable patients who were divided by treatment protocol into modified natural, antagonist, and long agonist groups. There were 52 modified natural cycles with GnRH antagonist supplementation, 200 stimulated cycles with GnRH antagonist, and 288 long GnRH agonist cycles. Cycle characteristics and treatment outcomes were compared between the groups. Results: The mean number of oocytes retrieved in the modified natural group was significantly lower than in the stimulated antagonist and long agonist groups (1.4 ± 0.5 vs. 2.3 ± 1.1 and 2.5 ± 1.1, respectively, p < 0.05). The respective implantation and pregnancy rates were 10% and 14.3%, 6.75% and 10.2%, and 7.4% and 10.6%. Cycle outcome and cycle properties were similar. Conclusions: Modified natural IVF cycle with GnRH antagonist supplementation is a feasible alternative to ovarian stimulation protocols in poor responders.
KW - GnRH antagonists
KW - IVF
KW - Natural cycle
KW - Ovulation induction
KW - Poor ovarian response
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=16844368724&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10815-005-1496-2
DO - 10.1007/s10815-005-1496-2
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:16844368724
SN - 1058-0468
VL - 22
SP - 75
EP - 79
JO - Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics
JF - Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics
IS - 2
ER -