TY - JOUR
T1 - MODEL‐BASED STACK
T2 - A METHOD FOR CONSTRUCTING AN ACCURATE ZERO‐OFFSET SECTION FOR COMPLEX OVERBURDENS
AU - LANDA, E.
AU - THORE, P.
AU - RESHEF, M.
PY - 1993/8
Y1 - 1993/8
N2 - The interpretation of stacked time sections can produce a correct geological image of the earth in cases when the stack represents a true zero‐offset section. This assumption is not valid in the presence of conflicting dips or strong lateral velocity variations. We present a method for constructing a relatively accurate zero‐offset section. We refer to this method as model‐based stack (MBS), and it is based on the idea of stacking traces within CMP gathers along actual traveltime curves, and not along hyperbolic trajectories as it is done in a conventional stacking process. These theoretical curves are calculated for each CMP gather by tracing rays through a velocity‐depth model. The last can be obtained using one of the methods for macromodel estimation. In this study we use the coherence inversion method for the estimation of the macromodel since it has the advantage of not requiring prestack traveltime picking. The MBS represents an accurate zero‐offset section in cases where the estimated macromodel is correct. Using the velocity–depth macromodel, the structural inversion can be completed by post‐stack depth migration of the MBS.
AB - The interpretation of stacked time sections can produce a correct geological image of the earth in cases when the stack represents a true zero‐offset section. This assumption is not valid in the presence of conflicting dips or strong lateral velocity variations. We present a method for constructing a relatively accurate zero‐offset section. We refer to this method as model‐based stack (MBS), and it is based on the idea of stacking traces within CMP gathers along actual traveltime curves, and not along hyperbolic trajectories as it is done in a conventional stacking process. These theoretical curves are calculated for each CMP gather by tracing rays through a velocity‐depth model. The last can be obtained using one of the methods for macromodel estimation. In this study we use the coherence inversion method for the estimation of the macromodel since it has the advantage of not requiring prestack traveltime picking. The MBS represents an accurate zero‐offset section in cases where the estimated macromodel is correct. Using the velocity–depth macromodel, the structural inversion can be completed by post‐stack depth migration of the MBS.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027788607&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/j.1365-2478.1993.tb00877.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1365-2478.1993.tb00877.x
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:0027788607
SN - 0016-8025
VL - 41
SP - 661
EP - 670
JO - Geophysical Prospecting
JF - Geophysical Prospecting
IS - 6
ER -